[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZsiZK5x77MRAyJdK@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 17:14:03 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jiawen Wu <jiawenwu@...stnetic.com>
Cc: andi.shyti@...nel.org, jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com,
mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com, jsd@...ihalf.com,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk,
piotr.raczynski@...el.com, andrew@...n.ch,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
mengyuanlou@...-swift.com, duanqiangwen@...-swift.com,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/3] net: txgbe: add IO address in I2C platform
device data
On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 11:02:40AM +0800, Jiawen Wu wrote:
> Consider the necessity of reading/writing the IO address to acquire and
> release the lock between software and firmware, add the IO address as
> the platform data to register I2C platform device.
...
> +#include <linux/platform_data/i2c-wx.h>
I don't like this. Can you provide a property for that or so?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists