[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240824124430.GI2164@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2024 13:44:30 +0100
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
Cc: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Adham Abozaeid <adham.abozaeid@...rochip.com>,
Ajay Singh <ajay.kathat@...rochip.com>,
Alexis Lothoré <alexis.lothore@...tlin.com>,
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] wifi: wilc1000: Fold wilc_get_chipid() into wlan.c
+ Dan
On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 10:38:59PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 8/23/24 7:46 PM, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 06:08:57PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > Do not use wilc_get_chipid() outside of wlan.c . Instead, call
> > > wilc_get_chipid() right after the SDIO/SPI interface has been
> > > initialized to cache the device chipid, and then use the cached
> > > chipid throughout the driver. Make wilc_get_chipid() static and
> > > remove its prototype from wlan.h .
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/microchip/wilc1000/wlan.c b/drivers/net/wireless/microchip/wilc1000/wlan.c
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > @@ -1535,9 +1537,18 @@ int wilc_wlan_init(struct net_device *dev)
> > > if (!wilc->hif_func->hif_is_init(wilc)) {
> > > acquire_bus(wilc, WILC_BUS_ACQUIRE_ONLY);
> > > ret = wilc->hif_func->hif_init(wilc, false);
> > > + if (!ret)
> > > + chipid = wilc_get_chipid(wilc);
> > > release_bus(wilc, WILC_BUS_RELEASE_ONLY);
> > > if (ret)
> > > goto fail;
> > > +
> > > + if (!is_wilc1000(chipid)) {
> > > + netdev_err(dev, "Unsupported chipid: %x\n", chipid);
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> >
> > Hi Marek,
> >
> > Should this unwind as is the case elsewhere in this function?
>
> It should, will fix in V3, thanks.
>
> > ret = -EINVAL;
> > goto fail;
> >
> > Flagged by Smatch.
>
> What's the trick here ?
Smatch is here. I don't think there is much of a trick other than running it :)
https://github.com/error27/smatch
Powered by blists - more mailing lists