[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e81473b2-174a-4ca1-ad66-2da98a513fcf@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 09:41:17 +0800
From: Hongbo Li <lihongbo22@...wei.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
CC: <johannes@...solutions.net>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
<kuba@...nel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>, <allison.henderson@...cle.com>,
<dsahern@...nel.org>, <pshelar@....org>, <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <rds-devel@....oracle.com>, <dccp@...r.kernel.org>,
<dev@...nvswitch.org>, <linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 7/8] net/rxrpc: Use min() to simplify the code
On 2024/8/24 20:06, David Howells wrote:
> Hongbo Li <lihongbo22@...wei.com> wrote:
>
>> - summary.ack_reason = (sp->ack.reason < RXRPC_ACK__INVALID ?
>> - sp->ack.reason : RXRPC_ACK__INVALID);
>> + summary.ack_reason = min(sp->ack.reason, RXRPC_ACK__INVALID);
>
> Can you use umin() rather than min(), please?
> I see reason is u8, may I use min_t(u8, sp->ack.reason, RXRPC_ACK__INVALID);
Thanks,
Hongbo
> Thanks,
> David
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists