[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240826.ToP3fahphub1@digikod.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 14:40:39 +0200
From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>
To: Tahera Fahimi <fahimitahera@...il.com>
Cc: outreachy@...ts.linux.dev, gnoack@...gle.com, paul@...l-moore.com,
jmorris@...ei.org, serge@...lyn.com, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com, jannh@...gle.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] selftest/Landlock: pthread_kill(3) tests
On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 05:57:08PM +0200, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> Please make sure all subject's prefixes are correct, there is two errors
> in the prefix and the description can be made more consistent with other
> patches, something like this: "selftests/landlock: Add
> signal_scoping_threads test"
>
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 12:29:23PM -0600, Tahera Fahimi wrote:
> > This patch expands the signal scoping tests with pthread_kill(3)
> > It tests if an scoped thread can send signal to a process in
> > the same scoped domain, or a non-sandboxed thread.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tahera Fahimi <fahimitahera@...il.com>
> > ---
> > .../selftests/landlock/scoped_signal_test.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/scoped_signal_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/scoped_signal_test.c
> > index 92958c6266ca..2edba1e6cd82 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/scoped_signal_test.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/scoped_signal_test.c
> > @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
> > #include <errno.h>
> > #include <fcntl.h>
> > #include <linux/landlock.h>
> > +#include <pthread.h>
> > #include <signal.h>
> > #include <sys/prctl.h>
> > #include <sys/types.h>
> > @@ -18,6 +19,7 @@
> >
> > #include "common.h"
> >
> > +#define DEFAULT_THREAD_RUNTIME 0.001
> > static sig_atomic_t signaled;
> >
> > static void create_signal_domain(struct __test_metadata *const _metadata)
> > @@ -299,4 +301,31 @@ TEST_F(signal_scoping, test_signal)
> > _metadata->exit_code = KSFT_FAIL;
> > }
> >
> > +static void *thread_func(void *arg)
> > +{
> > + sleep(DEFAULT_THREAD_RUNTIME);
>
> Using sleep() may make this test flaky. It needs to be removed and the
> test should work the same.
>
> > + return NULL;
> > +}
> > +
> > +TEST(signal_scoping_threads)
> > +{
> > + pthread_t no_sandbox_thread, scoped_thread;
> > + int err;
> > +
> > + ASSERT_EQ(0,
> > + pthread_create(&no_sandbox_thread, NULL, thread_func, NULL));
> > + create_signal_domain(_metadata);
> > + ASSERT_EQ(0, pthread_create(&scoped_thread, NULL, thread_func, NULL));
> > +
> > + /* Send signal to threads */
> > + err = pthread_kill(no_sandbox_thread, 0);
> > + ASSERT_EQ(EPERM, err);
Sometime the test failed because err == 0, I guess it's because I
removed the call to sleep(), but this just highlight a race condition in
the code anyway. We would need a synchronization primitive to make sure
the thread is still alive, something like the pipe read/write.
> > +
> > + err = pthread_kill(scoped_thread, 0);
> > + ASSERT_EQ(0, err);
> > +
> > + ASSERT_EQ(0, pthread_join(scoped_thread, NULL));
> > + ASSERT_EQ(0, pthread_join(no_sandbox_thread, NULL));
> > +}
> > +
> > TEST_HARNESS_MAIN
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists