lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <877cc2ujef.fsf@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 17:31:36 +0300
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Hongbo Li <lihongbo22@...wei.com>,  <johannes@...solutions.net>,
  <davem@...emloft.net>,  <edumazet@...gle.com>,  <pabeni@...hat.com>,
  <allison.henderson@...cle.com>,  <dsahern@...nel.org>,
  <pshelar@....org>,  <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
  <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,  <rds-devel@....oracle.com>,
  <dccp@...r.kernel.org>,  <dev@...nvswitch.org>,
  <linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/8] Use max/min to simplify the code

Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> writes:

> On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 07:45:02 +0300 Kalle Valo wrote:
>> > Do you mean some patches will go to other branches (such as mac80211)?  
>> 
>> Jakub means that your patchset had compilation errors, see the red on
>> patchwork:
>> 
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=882901&state=*&order=date
>
> FWIW I prefer not to point noobs to the patchwork checks, lest they
> think it's a public CI and they can fling broken code at the list :(

Good point, that's definitely what we do not want. I'll keep this in
mind.

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
https://docs.kernel.org/process/submitting-patches.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ