netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] tcp: make SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAL+tcoDfWdrDD5zTwyV_et3X1pgWhrmSpYra9_onM-MVDnFKJA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 23:31:22 +0800
From: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@...il.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com, 
	dsahern@...nel.org, willemb@...gle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, 
	Jason Xing <kernelxing@...cent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] tcp: make SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE
 feature per socket

Hello Jakub,

On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 10:46 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 25 Aug 2024 23:24:39 +0800 Jason Xing wrote:
> > However, there is one particular case that fails the selftests with
> > "./rxtimestamp: Expected swtstamp to not be set." error printing in
> > testcase 6.
>
> In case you ever find yourself looking for ways to improve our tests
> may I suggest trying to speed up fcnal_test.sh?  That'd be a very
> productive use of time.

Actually, I'm very into this timestamping feature which can be
extended in some aspects for debug&trace in production.

Since you mentioned that we can do more about that test, I think I
will take a deep look at it during the weekend :)

Thanks for letting me know :p