lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zs3yzYVCqyo8gP3w@shredder.mtl.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 18:37:49 +0300
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
To: Guillaume Nault <gnault@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
	pabeni@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, dsahern@...nel.org,
	ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, martin.lau@...ux.dev,
	john.fastabend@...il.com, steffen.klassert@...unet.com,
	herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 06/12] ipv4: Unmask upper DSCP bits when
 building flow key

On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 04:51:49PM +0200, Guillaume Nault wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 02:18:07PM +0300, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> > build_sk_flow_key() and __build_flow_key() are used to build an IPv4
> > flow key before calling one of the FIB lookup APIs.
> > 
> > Unmask the upper DSCP bits so that in the future the lookup could be
> > performed according to the full DSCP value.
> > 
> > Remove IPTOS_RT_MASK since it is no longer used.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
> > ---
> >  include/net/route.h | 2 --
> >  net/ipv4/route.c    | 4 ++--
> >  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/net/route.h b/include/net/route.h
> > index b896f086ec8e..1789f1e6640b 100644
> > --- a/include/net/route.h
> > +++ b/include/net/route.h
> > @@ -266,8 +266,6 @@ static inline void ip_rt_put(struct rtable *rt)
> >  	dst_release(&rt->dst);
> >  }
> >  
> > -#define IPTOS_RT_MASK	(IPTOS_TOS_MASK & ~3)
> > -
> 
> IPTOS_RT_MASK is still used by xfrm_get_tos() (net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c).
> To preserve bisectablility, this chunk should be moved to the next
> patch. Or just swap patch 6 and 7, whatever you prefer :).

Oops. The order was initially different and I forgot to rebuild each
patch after reordering the patches. Will move this chunk to the next
patch in v2.

Thanks!

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ