[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zs16fFk7sDIhcMP8@mev-dev.igk.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 09:04:28 +0200
From: Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski@...ux.intel.com>
To: Hongbo Li <lihongbo22@...wei.com>
Cc: sam@...dozajonas.com, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, horms@...nel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] net/ncsi: Use str_up_down to simplify
the code
On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 10:52:45AM +0800, Hongbo Li wrote:
> As str_up_down is the common helper to reback "up/down"
> string, we can replace the target with it to simplify
> the code and fix the coccinelle warning.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hongbo Li <lihongbo22@...wei.com>
> ---
> net/ncsi/ncsi-manage.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ncsi/ncsi-manage.c b/net/ncsi/ncsi-manage.c
> index 5ecf611c8820..13b4d393fb2d 100644
> --- a/net/ncsi/ncsi-manage.c
> +++ b/net/ncsi/ncsi-manage.c
> @@ -1281,7 +1281,7 @@ static int ncsi_choose_active_channel(struct ncsi_dev_priv *ndp)
> netdev_dbg(ndp->ndev.dev,
> "NCSI: Channel %u added to queue (link %s)\n",
> nc->id,
> - ncm->data[2] & 0x1 ? "up" : "down");
> + str_up_down(ncm->data[2] & 0x1));
Are you basing the commit on sth else than net-next? I can't see such
helper in the repo.
> }
>
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&nc->lock, cflags);
> --
> 2.34.1
>
You have the same commit message in both patches, they can be merged
into one I think.
Thanks,
Michal
Powered by blists - more mailing lists