[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240828135903.GD1368797@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 14:59:03 +0100
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Hongbo Li <lihongbo22@...wei.com>
Cc: johannes@...solutions.net, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, allison.henderson@...cle.com,
dsahern@...nel.org, pshelar@....org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, rds-devel@....oracle.com,
dccp@...r.kernel.org, dev@...nvswitch.org,
linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 4/8] net/core: Use min()/max() to simplify the
code
On Sat, Aug 24, 2024 at 03:40:29PM +0800, Hongbo Li wrote:
> Let's use min()/max() to simplify the code and fix the
> Coccinelle/coccicheck warning.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hongbo Li <lihongbo22@...wei.com>
...
> diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
> index bbe4c58470c3..c9910f48903f 100644
> --- a/net/core/sock.c
> +++ b/net/core/sock.c
> @@ -3800,7 +3800,7 @@ int sock_prot_inuse_get(struct net *net, struct proto *prot)
> for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
> res += per_cpu_ptr(net->core.prot_inuse, cpu)->val[idx];
>
> - return res >= 0 ? res : 0;
> + return max(res, 0);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sock_prot_inuse_get);
As per my comment on 2/8 [*], I think you should drop this hunk.
[*] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240828135310.GC1368797@kernel.org/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists