netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/5 next] net: vertexcom: mse102x: Use DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240828143959.GI1368797@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 15:39:59 +0100
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Stefan Wahren <wahrenst@....net>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5 next] net: vertexcom: mse102x: Use
 DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS

On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 09:09:56PM +0200, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> This macro has the advantage over SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS that we don't
> have to care about when the functions are actually used.
> 
> Also make use of pm_sleep_ptr() to discard all PM_SLEEP related
> stuff if CONFIG_PM_SLEEP isn't enabled.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Wahren <wahrenst@....net>

Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>

One note, no need to respin because of this.
This series should be targeted at net-next.

	Subject: [PATCH m/n net-next] ...