netdev - Re: [PATCH 07/11] pinctrl: rp1: Implement RaspberryPi RP1 gpio support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Zs9BN_w4Ueq-VkJr@apocalypse>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 17:24:39 +0200
From: Andrea della Porta <andrea.porta@...e.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Andrea della Porta <andrea.porta@...e.com>,
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>,
	Broadcom internal kernel review list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
	Derek Kiernan <derek.kiernan@....com>,
	Dragan Cvetic <dragan.cvetic@....com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
	Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
	Stefan Wahren <wahrenst@....net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/11] pinctrl: rp1: Implement RaspberryPi RP1 gpio
 support

Hi Linus,

On 10:59 Mon 26 Aug     , Linus Walleij wrote:
> Hi Andrea,
> 
> thanks for your patch!

Thanks for your review!

> 
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 4:36 PM Andrea della Porta
> <andrea.porta@...e.com> wrote:
> 
> > The RP1 is an MFD supporting a gpio controller and /pinmux/pinctrl.
> > Add minimum support for the gpio only portion. The driver is in
> > pinctrl folder since upcoming patches will add the pinmux/pinctrl
> > support where the gpio part can be seen as an addition.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andrea della Porta <andrea.porta@...e.com>
> (...)
> 
> > +#include <linux/bitmap.h>
> > +#include <linux/bitops.h>
> (...)
> 
> > +static void rp1_pad_update(struct rp1_pin_info *pin, u32 clr, u32 set)
> > +{
> > +       u32 padctrl = readl(pin->pad);
> > +
> > +       padctrl &= ~clr;
> > +       padctrl |= set;
> > +
> > +       writel(padctrl, pin->pad);
> > +}
> 
> Looks a bit like a reimplementation of regmap-mmio? If you want to do
> this why not use regmap-mmio?

Agreed. I can leverage regmail_field to get rid of the reimplemented code
for the pin->pad register region. Do you think it could be worth using
regmap-mmio also on pin->gpio, pin->inte, pin->ints and pin->rio even
though they are not doing any special field manipulation as the pin->pad
case? 

> 
> > +static void rp1_set_dir(struct rp1_pin_info *pin, bool is_input)
> > +{
> > +       int offset = is_input ? RP1_CLR_OFFSET : RP1_SET_OFFSET;
> > +
> > +       writel(1 << pin->offset, pin->rio + RP1_RIO_OE + offset);
> 
> If you include bitops.h what about:
> 
> writel(BIT(pin->offset), pin->rio + RP1_RIO_OE + offset);

Ack.

> 
> > +static int rp1_get_value(struct rp1_pin_info *pin)
> > +{
> > +       return !!(readl(pin->rio + RP1_RIO_IN) & (1 << pin->offset));
> > +}
> 
> Also here

Ack.

> 
> > +
> > +static void rp1_set_value(struct rp1_pin_info *pin, int value)
> > +{
> > +       /* Assume the pin is already an output */
> > +       writel(1 << pin->offset,
> > +              pin->rio + RP1_RIO_OUT + (value ? RP1_SET_OFFSET : RP1_CLR_OFFSET));
> > +}
> 
> And here

Ack.

> 
> > +static int rp1_gpio_set_config(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset,
> > +                              unsigned long config)
> > +{
> > +       struct rp1_pin_info *pin = rp1_get_pin(chip, offset);
> > +       unsigned long configs[] = { config };
> > +
> > +       return rp1_pinconf_set(pin, offset, configs,
> > +                              ARRAY_SIZE(configs));
> > +}
> 
> Nice that you implement this!

Thanks :)

> 
> > +static void rp1_gpio_irq_config(struct rp1_pin_info *pin, bool enable)
> > +{
> > +       writel(1 << pin->offset,
> > +              pin->inte + (enable ? RP1_SET_OFFSET : RP1_CLR_OFFSET));
> 
> BIT()

Ack.

Many thanks,
Andrea

> 
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij