[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4c2c2ec2-bc6b-4201-8e65-342a354c469f@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 15:22:15 -0700
From: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
To: <edward.cree@....com>, <linux-net-drivers@....com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<kuba@...nel.org>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <pabeni@...hat.com>
CC: Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@...il.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/6] sfc: add n_rx_overlength to ethtool stats
On 8/28/2024 6:45 AM, edward.cree@....com wrote:
> From: Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@...il.com>
>
> This counter is the main difference between the old and new locations
> of the rx_packets increment (the other is scatter errors which
> produce a WARN_ON). It previously was not reported anywhere; add it
> to ethtool -S output to ensure users still have this information.
>
The description makes sense in context with the whole series but doesn't
quite work for me if I think about viewing it without context. Perhaps a
little more clarification about the rx_packets behavioral change?
> Signed-off-by: Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@...il.com>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
> drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ethtool_common.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ethtool_common.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ethtool_common.c
> index a8baeacd83c0..ae32e08540fa 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ethtool_common.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ethtool_common.c
> @@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ static const struct efx_sw_stat_desc efx_sw_stat_desc[] = {
> EFX_ETHTOOL_UINT_CHANNEL_STAT(rx_outer_tcp_udp_chksum_err),
> EFX_ETHTOOL_UINT_CHANNEL_STAT(rx_eth_crc_err),
> EFX_ETHTOOL_UINT_CHANNEL_STAT(rx_frm_trunc),
> + EFX_ETHTOOL_UINT_CHANNEL_STAT(rx_overlength),
> EFX_ETHTOOL_UINT_CHANNEL_STAT(rx_merge_events),
> EFX_ETHTOOL_UINT_CHANNEL_STAT(rx_merge_packets),
> EFX_ETHTOOL_UINT_CHANNEL_STAT(rx_xdp_drops),
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists