[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240828112207.5c199d41@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 11:22:07 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: Jason Xing <kernelxing@...cent.com>, Networking
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Next Mailing List
<linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, Xueming Feng <kuro@...oa.me>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in:
net/ipv4/tcp.c
between commit:
bac76cf89816 ("tcp: fix forever orphan socket caused by tcp_abort")
from the net tree and commit:
edefba66d929 ("tcp: rstreason: introduce SK_RST_REASON_TCP_STATE for active reset")
from the net-next tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc net/ipv4/tcp.c
index 831a18dc7aa6,8514257f4ecd..000000000000
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
@@@ -4653,10 -4649,12 +4656,10 @@@ int tcp_abort(struct sock *sk, int err
local_bh_disable();
bh_lock_sock(sk);
- if (!sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD)) {
- if (tcp_need_reset(sk->sk_state))
- tcp_send_active_reset(sk, GFP_ATOMIC,
- SK_RST_REASON_TCP_STATE);
- tcp_done_with_error(sk, err);
- }
+ if (tcp_need_reset(sk->sk_state))
+ tcp_send_active_reset(sk, GFP_ATOMIC,
- SK_RST_REASON_NOT_SPECIFIED);
++ SK_RST_REASON_TCP_STATE);
+ tcp_done_with_error(sk, err);
bh_unlock_sock(sk);
local_bh_enable();
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists