netdev - Re: [PATCH net] docs: netdev: document guidance on cleanup.h

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aafc72ad-1672-43bf-a332-d4f40fa7dab3@lunn.ch>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 17:56:42 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com,
	pabeni@...hat.com, corbet@....net, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] docs: netdev: document guidance on cleanup.h

On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 08:20:25AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> Document what was discussed multiple times on list and various
> virtual / in-person conversations. guard() being okay in functions
> <= 20 LoC is my own invention. If the function is trivial it should
> be fine, but feel free to disagree :)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>

When discussing guard() etc, i have said we would reconsider this in a
couple of years looking at the experience of other subsystems. Maybe
something about this could be added to the commit message?

Otherwise:

Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>

    Andrew