netdev - Re: [PATCHv2 net-next] net: ag71xx: update FIFO bits and descriptions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240829205522.GC1368797@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 21:55:22 +0100
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Rosen Penev <rosenp@...il.com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
	linux@...linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	o.rempel@...gutronix.de, p.zabel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 net-next] net: ag71xx: update FIFO bits and descriptions

On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 01:21:02PM -0700, Rosen Penev wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 12:47 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 29 Aug 2024 10:47:01 -0700 Rosen Penev wrote:
> > > > Please consider a patch to allow compilation of this driver with
> > > > COMPILE_TEST in order to increase build coverage.
> > > Is that just
> >
> > Aha, do that and run an allmodconfig build on x86 to make sure nothing
> > breaks. If it's all fine please submit
> Funny enough it did break due to a mistake (L0 vs LO).

Then I'd say this exercise is a success :)

> I guess I'll
> send a series just to keep these patches together.

In general, if you have multiple patches for the same driver,
for a single tree (net or net-next) I would either:
1) Send them as a series
2) Wait for one to be accepted before sending the next one

Option 1 seems appropriate here.