[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e05705c1-95dc-4d77-8a0d-8c2a785b0b05@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2024 13:46:27 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Andrea della Porta <andrea.porta@...e.com>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>,
Broadcom internal kernel review list
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Derek Kiernan <derek.kiernan@....com>, Dragan Cvetic
<dragan.cvetic@....com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Stefan Wahren <wahrenst@....net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] dt-bindings: pinctrl: Add RaspberryPi RP1
gpio/pinctrl/pinmux bindings
On 30/08/2024 12:22, Andrea della Porta wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
...
>>> +#define RP1_USBHOST0_AXIS_BASE 0x200000
>>> +#define RP1_USBHOST1_AXIS_BASE 0x300000
>>> +#define RP1_EXAC_BASE 0x400000
>>> +
>>> +/* Interrupts */
>>> +
>>> +#define RP1_INT_IO_BANK0 0
>>> +#define RP1_INT_IO_BANK1 1
>>
>> Also no, interrupt numbers are not considered bindings. That's too much
>> churn. Otherwise, please point me to driver code using the define
>> (directly! that's the requirement).
>
> As mentioned above, RP1_INT_END is used in rp1-pci.c. To get rid of all those
Number of interrupts is not a binding, either. Does not appear in the DTS.
> macroes from dt-binding would mean to hardcode the interrupt number in both
> the binding example and in dtso, from this:
>
> interrupts = <RP1_INT_IO_BANK0 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> <RP1_INT_IO_BANK1 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> <RP1_INT_IO_BANK2 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>
> to this:
>
> interrupts = <0 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> <1 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> <2 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>
> is this what you are proposing?
Yes, just like every DTS does. I think the hard-coding of numbers is not
a problem.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists