[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240831095840.4173362-2-lihongbo22@huawei.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2024 17:58:37 +0800
From: Hongbo Li <lihongbo22@...wei.com>
To: <kees@...nel.org>, <andy@...nel.org>, <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>,
<jasowang@...hat.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
<kuba@...nel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>, <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: <linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-mm@...ck.org>, <lihongbo22@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH -next 1/4] lib/string_choices: Introduce several opposite string choice helpers
Similar to the exists helper: str_enable_disable/
str_enabled_disabled/str_on_off/str_yes_no helpers, we can
add the opposite helpers. That's str_disable_enable,
str_disabled_enabled, str_off_on and str_no_yes.
There are more than 10 cases currently (expect
str_disable_enable now has 3 use cases) exist in the code
can be replaced with these helper.
Signed-off-by: Hongbo Li <lihongbo22@...wei.com>
---
include/linux/string_choices.h | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/string_choices.h b/include/linux/string_choices.h
index f3670dbd1169..c2134eeda1fd 100644
--- a/include/linux/string_choices.h
+++ b/include/linux/string_choices.h
@@ -8,11 +8,13 @@ static inline const char *str_enable_disable(bool v)
{
return v ? "enable" : "disable";
}
+#define str_disable_enable(v) str_enable_disable(!(v))
static inline const char *str_enabled_disabled(bool v)
{
return v ? "enabled" : "disabled";
}
+#define str_disabled_enabled(v) str_enabled_disabled(!(v))
static inline const char *str_hi_lo(bool v)
{
@@ -36,11 +38,13 @@ static inline const char *str_on_off(bool v)
{
return v ? "on" : "off";
}
+#define str_off_on(v) str_on_off(!(v))
static inline const char *str_yes_no(bool v)
{
return v ? "yes" : "no";
}
+#define str_no_yes(v) str_yes_no(!(v))
static inline const char *str_true_false(bool v)
{
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists