[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL+tcoAxVG7xpjXG+gyqoJjspn16F3Nfq5-8BoyVqO13qFm5xg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2024 23:00:27 +0800
From: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@...il.com>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, dsahern@...nel.org, willemb@...gle.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jason Xing <kernelxing@...cent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/2] net-timestamp: filter out report when
setting SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE
On Sat, Aug 31, 2024 at 10:50 PM Willem de Bruijn
<willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Jason Xing wrote:
> > From: Jason Xing <kernelxing@...cent.com>
> >
> > introduce a new flag SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_RX_SOFTWARE_FILTER in the
> > receive path. User can set it with SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE to filter
> > out rx timestamp report, especially after a process turns on
> > netstamp_needed_key which can time stamp every incoming skb.
> >
> > Previously, We found out if an application starts first which turns on
> > netstamp_needed_key, then another one only passing SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE
> > could also get rx timestamp. Now we handle this case by introducing this
> > new flag without breaking users.
> >
> > In this way, we have two kinds of combination:
> > 1. setting SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE|SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE, it
> > will surely allow users to get the rx timestamp report.
> > 2. setting SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE|SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_RX_SOFTWARE_FILTER
> > while the skb is timestamped, it will stop reporting the rx timestamp.
>
> The one point this commit does not explain is why a process would want
> to request software timestamp reporting, but not receive software
> timestamp generation. The only use I see is when the application does
> request SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE | SOF_TIMESTAMPING_TX_SOFTWARE.
Yes, you're right.
>
> > Another thing about errqueue in this patch I have a few words to say:
> > In this case, we need to handle the egress path carefully, or else
> > reporting the tx timestamp will fail. Egress path and ingress path will
> > finally call sock_recv_timestamp(). We have to distinguish them.
> > Errqueue is a good indicator to reflect the flow direction.
>
> Good find on skb_is_err_queue rather than open-coding PACKET_OUTGOING.
>
> > Suggested-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jason Xing <kernelxing@...cent.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
Thanks for your review:)
>
> > ---
> > 1. Willem suggested this alternative way to solve the issue, so I
> > added his Suggested-by tag here. Thanks!
> > ---
> > Documentation/networking/timestamping.rst | 12 ++++++++++++
> > include/uapi/linux/net_tstamp.h | 3 ++-
> > net/core/sock.c | 4 ++++
> > net/ethtool/common.c | 1 +
> > net/ipv4/tcp.c | 7 +++++--
> > net/socket.c | 5 ++++-
> > 6 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/networking/timestamping.rst b/Documentation/networking/timestamping.rst
> > index 5e93cd71f99f..ef2a334d373e 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/networking/timestamping.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/networking/timestamping.rst
> > @@ -266,6 +266,18 @@ SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_TX_SWHW:
> > two separate messages will be looped to the socket's error queue,
> > each containing just one timestamp.
> >
> > +SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_RX_SOFTWARE_FILTER:
> > + Used in the receive software timestamp. Enabling the flag along with
> > + SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE will not report the rx timestamp to the
> > + userspace so that it can filter out the case where one process starts
> > + first which turns on netstamp_needed_key through setting generation
> > + flags like SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE, then another one only passing
> > + SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE report flag could also get the rx timestamp.
> > +
> > + SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_RX_SOFTWARE_FILTER prevents the application from
> > + being influenced by others and let the application finally choose
> > + whether to report the timestamp in the receive path or not.
> > +
>
> nit, so no need to revise, but for next time:
>
> Documentation should describe the current state, not a history of
> changes (log), so wording like "finally" does not belong.
I learned it, and will bear it in my mind:)
Thanks,
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists