[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <27a0d076-ed61-486b-b961-8a0982e7b96d@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2024 08:29:01 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>, woojung.huh@...rochip.com,
andrew@...n.ch, olteanv@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
alsi@...g-olufsen.dk, justin.chen@...adcom.com,
sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com, alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com,
joabreu@...opsys.com, mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com, wens@...e.org,
jernej.skrabec@...il.com, samuel@...lland.org, hkallweit1@...il.com,
linux@...linux.org.uk, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev, linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
krzk@...nel.org, jic23@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 5/8] net: mdio: mux-mmioreg: Simplified with
dev_err_probe()
On 8/29/2024 8:13 PM, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
> Use the dev_err_probe() helper to simplify code.
>
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>
> ---
> v4:
> - Remove the extra parentheses.
> v3:
> - Add Reviewed-by.
> v2:
> - Split into 2 patches.
> ---
> drivers/net/mdio/mdio-mux-mmioreg.c | 48 ++++++++++++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/mdio/mdio-mux-mmioreg.c b/drivers/net/mdio/mdio-mux-mmioreg.c
> index 4d87e61fec7b..b70e6d1ad429 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/mdio/mdio-mux-mmioreg.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/mdio/mdio-mux-mmioreg.c
> @@ -109,30 +109,25 @@ static int mdio_mux_mmioreg_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> ret = of_address_to_resource(np, 0, &res);
> - if (ret) {
> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "could not obtain memory map for node %pOF\n",
> - np);
> - return ret;
> - }
> + if (ret)
> + return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret,
> + "could not obtain memory map for node %pOF\n", np);
Besides that one, which I don't think is even a candidate for resource
deferral in the first place given the OF platform implementation, it
does not seem to help that much to switch to dev_err_probe() other than
just combining the error message and return code in a single statement.
So it's fewer lines of codes, but it is not exactly what dev_err_probe()
was originally intended for IMHO.
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>
--
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists