[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZtWGiXUsWZOVAXRv@apocalypse>
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2024 11:34:01 +0200
From: Andrea della Porta <andrea.porta@...e.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Stefan Wahren <wahrenst@....net>,
Andrea della Porta <andrea.porta@...e.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>,
Broadcom internal kernel review list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Derek Kiernan <derek.kiernan@....com>,
Dragan Cvetic <dragan.cvetic@....com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/11] misc: rp1: RaspberryPi RP1 misc driver
Hi Rob,
On 13:27 Fri 30 Aug , Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 11:31 AM Andrea della Porta
> <andrea.porta@...e.com> wrote:
> >
...
> >
> > Since u-boot is lacking support for RP1 we cannot really produce some test
> > results to check the compatibility versus kernel dtb overlay but we can
> > speculate a little bit about it. AFAIK u-boot would probably place the rp1
> > node directly under its pcie@...00 node in DT while the dtb overlay will use
> > dynamically created PCI endpoint node (dev@0) as parent for rp1 node.
>
> u-boot could do that and it would not be following the 25+ year old
> PCI bus bindings. Some things may be argued about as "Linux bindings",
> but that isn't one of them.
Indeed. It was just speculation, not something I would bet on.
Regards,
Andrea
>
> Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists