[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240903095111.7204-1-liujing@cmss.chinamobile.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2024 17:51:11 +0800
From: Liu Jing <liujing@...s.chinamobile.com>
To: davem@...emloft.net
Cc: edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com,
shuah@...nel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Liu Jing <liujing@...s.chinamobile.com>
Subject: [PATCH] selftests/net: do_setcpu function not need to have a return value
in the do_setcpu, this function does not need to have a return value,
which is meaningless
Signed-off-by: Liu Jing <liujing@...s.chinamobile.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/net/msg_zerocopy.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/msg_zerocopy.c b/tools/testing/selftests/net/msg_zerocopy.c
index bdc03a2097e8..0b54f2011449 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/msg_zerocopy.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/msg_zerocopy.c
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ static uint16_t get_ip_csum(const uint16_t *start, int num_words)
return ~sum;
}
-static int do_setcpu(int cpu)
+static void do_setcpu(int cpu)
{
cpu_set_t mask;
@@ -129,7 +129,6 @@ static int do_setcpu(int cpu)
else if (cfg_verbose)
fprintf(stderr, "cpu: %u\n", cpu);
- return 0;
}
static void do_setsockopt(int fd, int level, int optname, int val)
--
2.33.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists