netdev - Re: pull-request: ieee802154 for net 2024-09-01

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <750caf49-c4e0-43f7-a89f-5b9af96fc0f9@datenfreihafen.org>
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2024 20:52:03 +0200
From: Stefan Schmidt <stefan@...enfreihafen.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, pabeni@...hat.com, linux-wpan@...r.kernel.org,
 alex.aring@...il.com, miquel.raynal@...tlin.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: pull-request: ieee802154 for net 2024-09-01

Hello.

On 9/3/24 8:42 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Sun,  1 Sep 2024 20:42:13 +0200 Stefan Schmidt wrote:
>> Simon Horman catched two typos in our headers. No functional change.
> 
> Is it okay if we merge these into net-next ?
> On one hand they are unlikely^w guaranteed not to introduce
> regressions, but on the other such trivial spelling fixes are
> not at all urgent.

Sure, no problem. They just landed in my fixes queue and thus wpan. They 
can easily go through net-next. Can you merge the pull directly or do 
need a new one against net-next?

regards
Stefan Schmidt