netdev - [PATCH 5.10, 5.4] net: set SOCK_RCU_FREE before inserting socket into hashtable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <004b3dec44fe2fe6433043c509d52e72d8a8ca9d.camel@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 13:06:45 +0000
From: Siddh Raman Pant <siddh.raman.pant@...cle.com>
To: "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10, 5.4] net: set SOCK_RCU_FREE before inserting socket into
 hashtable

[ Upstream commit 871019b22d1bcc9fab2d1feba1b9a564acbb6e99 ]

We've started to see the following kernel traces:

 WARNING: CPU: 83 PID: 0 at net/core/filter.c:6641 sk_lookup+0x1bd/0x1d0

 Call Trace:
  <IRQ>
  __bpf_skc_lookup+0x10d/0x120
  bpf_sk_lookup+0x48/0xd0
  bpf_sk_lookup_tcp+0x19/0x20
  bpf_prog_<redacted>+0x37c/0x16a3
  cls_bpf_classify+0x205/0x2e0
  tcf_classify+0x92/0x160
  __netif_receive_skb_core+0xe52/0xf10
  __netif_receive_skb_list_core+0x96/0x2b0
  napi_complete_done+0x7b5/0xb70
  <redacted>_poll+0x94/0xb0
  net_rx_action+0x163/0x1d70
  __do_softirq+0xdc/0x32e
  asm_call_irq_on_stack+0x12/0x20
  </IRQ>
  do_softirq_own_stack+0x36/0x50
  do_softirq+0x44/0x70

__inet_hash can race with lockless (rcu) readers on the other cpus:

  __inet_hash
    __sk_nulls_add_node_rcu
    <- (bpf triggers here)
    sock_set_flag(SOCK_RCU_FREE)

Let's move the SOCK_RCU_FREE part up a bit, before we are inserting
the socket into hashtables. Note, that the race is really harmless;
the bpf callers are handling this situation (where listener socket
doesn't have SOCK_RCU_FREE set) correctly, so the only
annoyance is a WARN_ONCE.

More details from Eric regarding SOCK_RCU_FREE timeline:

Commit 3b24d854cb35 ("tcp/dccp: do not touch listener sk_refcnt under
synflood") added SOCK_RCU_FREE. At that time, the precise location of
sock_set_flag(sk, SOCK_RCU_FREE) did not matter, because the thread calling
__inet_hash() owns a reference on sk. SOCK_RCU_FREE was only tested
at dismantle time.

Commit 6acc9b432e67 ("bpf: Add helper to retrieve socket in BPF")
started checking SOCK_RCU_FREE _after_ the lookup to infer whether
the refcount has been taken care of.

Fixes: 6acc9b432e67 ("bpf: Add helper to retrieve socket in BPF")
Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
Reviewed-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
[Resolved conflict for 5.10 and below.]
Signed-off-by: Siddh Raman Pant <siddh.raman.pant@...cle.com>
---
 net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c b/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c
index 56deddeac1b0..0fb5d758264f 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c
@@ -653,6 +653,7 @@ int __inet_hash(struct sock *sk, struct sock *osk)
 		if (err)
 			goto unlock;
 	}
+	sock_set_flag(sk, SOCK_RCU_FREE);
 	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6) && sk->sk_reuseport &&
 		sk->sk_family == AF_INET6)
 		__sk_nulls_add_node_tail_rcu(sk, &ilb->nulls_head);
@@ -660,7 +661,6 @@ int __inet_hash(struct sock *sk, struct sock *osk)
 		__sk_nulls_add_node_rcu(sk, &ilb->nulls_head);
 	inet_hash2(hashinfo, sk);
 	ilb->count++;
-	sock_set_flag(sk, SOCK_RCU_FREE);
 	sock_prot_inuse_add(sock_net(sk), sk->sk_prot, 1);
 unlock:
 	spin_unlock(&ilb->lock);
-- 
2.45.2


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)