netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v7 3/7] net: stmmac: refactor FPE verification process

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240904140448.6hvjzj3ei2k7jdbe@skbuf>
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 17:04:48 +0300
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To: Furong Xu <0x1207@...il.com>
Cc: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>,
	Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
	Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
	Joao Pinto <jpinto@...opsys.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk, linux@...linux.org.uk, xfr@...look.com,
	Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v7 3/7] net: stmmac: refactor FPE verification
 process

On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 05:21:18PM +0800, Furong Xu wrote:
> +/**
> + * stmmac_fpe_verify_timer - Timer for MAC Merge verification
> + * @t:  timer_list struct containing private info
> + *
> + * Verify the MAC Merge capability in the local TX direction, by
> + * transmitting Verify mPackets up to 3 times. Wait until link
> + * partner responds with a Response mPacket, otherwise fail.
> + */
> +static void stmmac_fpe_verify_timer(struct timer_list *t)
>  {
> -	struct stmmac_priv *priv = container_of(work, struct stmmac_priv,
> -						fpe_task);
> -	struct stmmac_fpe_cfg *fpe_cfg = &priv->fpe_cfg;
> -	enum stmmac_fpe_state *lo_state = &fpe_cfg->lo_fpe_state;
> -	enum stmmac_fpe_state *lp_state = &fpe_cfg->lp_fpe_state;
> -	bool *hs_enable = &fpe_cfg->hs_enable;
> -	bool *enable = &fpe_cfg->enable;
> -	int retries = 20;
> -
> -	while (retries-- > 0) {
> -		/* Bail out immediately if FPE handshake is OFF */
> -		if (*lo_state == FPE_STATE_OFF || !*hs_enable)
> -			break;
> -
> -		if (*lo_state == FPE_STATE_ENTERING_ON &&
> -		    *lp_state == FPE_STATE_ENTERING_ON) {
> -			stmmac_fpe_configure(priv, priv->ioaddr,
> -					     fpe_cfg,
> -					     priv->plat->tx_queues_to_use,
> -					     priv->plat->rx_queues_to_use,
> -					     *enable);
> -
> -			netdev_info(priv->dev, "configured FPE\n");
> +	struct stmmac_fpe_cfg *fpe_cfg = from_timer(fpe_cfg, t, verify_timer);
> +	struct stmmac_priv *priv = container_of(fpe_cfg, struct stmmac_priv,
> +						fpe_cfg);
> +	struct ethtool_mm_state *state = &fpe_cfg->state;
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +	bool rearm = false;
>  
> -			*lo_state = FPE_STATE_ON;
> -			*lp_state = FPE_STATE_ON;
> -			netdev_info(priv->dev, "!!! BOTH FPE stations ON\n");
> -			break;
> -		}
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&fpe_cfg->lock, flags);
>  
> -		if ((*lo_state == FPE_STATE_CAPABLE ||
> -		     *lo_state == FPE_STATE_ENTERING_ON) &&
> -		     *lp_state != FPE_STATE_ON) {
> -			netdev_info(priv->dev, SEND_VERIFY_MPAKCET_FMT,
> -				    *lo_state, *lp_state);
> +	switch (state->verify_status) {
> +	case ETHTOOL_MM_VERIFY_STATUS_INITIAL:
> +	case ETHTOOL_MM_VERIFY_STATUS_VERIFYING:
> +		if (fpe_cfg->verify_retries != 0) {
>  			stmmac_fpe_send_mpacket(priv, priv->ioaddr,
> -						fpe_cfg,
> -						MPACKET_VERIFY);
> +						fpe_cfg, MPACKET_VERIFY);
> +			rearm = true;
> +		} else {
> +			state->verify_status = ETHTOOL_MM_VERIFY_STATUS_FAILED;
>  		}
> -		/* Sleep then retry */
> -		msleep(500);
> +
> +		fpe_cfg->verify_retries--;
> +	break;

Odd indentation... "break;" should be on the same level with the code,
not with the "case" statements. Not sure which editor you use, but even
if you hit "==" in vim on this line, it will shift it by one tab to the
right.

> +
> +	case ETHTOOL_MM_VERIFY_STATUS_SUCCEEDED:
> +		stmmac_fpe_configure(priv, priv->ioaddr, fpe_cfg,
> +				     priv->plat->tx_queues_to_use,
> +				     priv->plat->rx_queues_to_use,
> +				     true, true);
> +	break;

Same comment here and below.

> +
> +	default:
> +	break;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (rearm) {
> +		mod_timer(&fpe_cfg->verify_timer,
> +			  jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(state->verify_time));
>  	}
>  
> -	clear_bit(__FPE_TASK_SCHED, &priv->fpe_task_state);
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fpe_cfg->lock, flags);
> +}