netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: phy: qca83xx: use PHY_ID_MATCH

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKxU2N8sXUnMvXmJ4s045J6Y0UiQZVufJFaxA4=cXOvnEt=8Bg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 15:02:11 -0700
From: Rosen Penev <rosenp@...il.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, 
	kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, linux@...linux.org.uk, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ansuelsmth@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: phy: qca83xx: use PHY_ID_MATCH_EXACT

On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 2:43 PM Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 01:56:59PM -0700, Rosen Penev wrote:
> > No need for the mask when there's already a macro for this.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev <rosenp@...il.com>
>
> The Subject should be [PATCH net-next]. Yes, we all keep forgetting
> it, but it is important to the CI.
Procedural mistake. Need to use --subject-prefix looks like. Should I resend?
>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
>
>     Andrew