| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20240905075622.66819-6-lulie@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2024 15:56:22 +0800
From: Philo Lu <lulie@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc: edumazet@...gle.com,
rostedt@...dmis.org,
mhiramat@...nel.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
martin.lau@...ux.dev,
ast@...nel.org,
daniel@...earbox.net,
andrii@...nel.org,
eddyz87@...il.com,
song@...nel.org,
yonghong.song@...ux.dev,
john.fastabend@...il.com,
kpsingh@...nel.org,
sdf@...ichev.me,
haoluo@...gle.com,
jolsa@...nel.org,
davem@...emloft.net,
kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com,
mykolal@...com,
shuah@...nel.org,
mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com,
alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com,
thinker.li@...il.com,
juntong.deng@...look.com,
jrife@...gle.com,
alan.maguire@...cle.com,
davemarchevsky@...com,
dxu@...uu.xyz,
vmalik@...hat.com,
cupertino.miranda@...cle.com,
mattbobrowski@...gle.com,
xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 5/5] selftests/bpf: Expand skb dynptr selftests for tp_btf
Add 3 test cases for skb dynptr used in tp_btf:
- test_dynptr_skb_tp_btf: use skb dynptr in tp_btf and make sure it is
read-only.
- skb_invalid_ctx_fentry/skb_invalid_ctx_fexit: bpf_dynptr_from_skb
should fail in fentry/fexit.
In test_dynptr_skb_tp_btf, to trigger the tracepoint in kfree_skb,
test_pkt_access is used for its test_run, as in kfree_skb.c. Because the
test process is different from others, a new setup type is defined,
i.e., SETUP_SKB_PROG_TP.
The result is like:
$ ./test_progs -t 'dynptr/test_dynptr_skb_tp_btf'
#84/14 dynptr/test_dynptr_skb_tp_btf:OK
#84 dynptr:OK
#127 kfunc_dynptr_param:OK
Summary: 2/1 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
$ ./test_progs -t 'dynptr/skb_invalid_ctx_f'
#84/85 dynptr/skb_invalid_ctx_fentry:OK
#84/86 dynptr/skb_invalid_ctx_fexit:OK
#84 dynptr:OK
#127 kfunc_dynptr_param:OK
Summary: 2/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
Also fix two coding style nits (change spaces to tabs).
Signed-off-by: Philo Lu <lulie@...ux.alibaba.com>
---
.../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/dynptr.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++--
.../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/dynptr_fail.c | 25 +++++++++++++
.../selftests/bpf/progs/dynptr_success.c | 23 ++++++++++++
3 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/dynptr.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/dynptr.c
index 7cfac53c0d58d..ba40be8b1c4ef 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/dynptr.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/dynptr.c
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
enum test_setup_type {
SETUP_SYSCALL_SLEEP,
SETUP_SKB_PROG,
+ SETUP_SKB_PROG_TP,
};
static struct {
@@ -28,6 +29,7 @@ static struct {
{"test_dynptr_clone", SETUP_SKB_PROG},
{"test_dynptr_skb_no_buff", SETUP_SKB_PROG},
{"test_dynptr_skb_strcmp", SETUP_SKB_PROG},
+ {"test_dynptr_skb_tp_btf", SETUP_SKB_PROG_TP},
};
static void verify_success(const char *prog_name, enum test_setup_type setup_type)
@@ -35,7 +37,7 @@ static void verify_success(const char *prog_name, enum test_setup_type setup_typ
struct dynptr_success *skel;
struct bpf_program *prog;
struct bpf_link *link;
- int err;
+ int err;
skel = dynptr_success__open();
if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "dynptr_success__open"))
@@ -47,7 +49,7 @@ static void verify_success(const char *prog_name, enum test_setup_type setup_typ
if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(prog, "bpf_object__find_program_by_name"))
goto cleanup;
- bpf_program__set_autoload(prog, true);
+ bpf_program__set_autoload(prog, true);
err = dynptr_success__load(skel);
if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "dynptr_success__load"))
@@ -87,6 +89,36 @@ static void verify_success(const char *prog_name, enum test_setup_type setup_typ
break;
}
+ case SETUP_SKB_PROG_TP:
+ {
+ struct __sk_buff skb = {};
+ struct bpf_object *obj;
+ int aux_prog_fd;
+
+ /* Just use its test_run to trigger kfree_skb tracepoint */
+ err = bpf_prog_test_load("./test_pkt_access.bpf.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+ &obj, &aux_prog_fd);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "prog_load sched cls"))
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts,
+ .data_in = &pkt_v4,
+ .data_size_in = sizeof(pkt_v4),
+ .ctx_in = &skb,
+ .ctx_size_in = sizeof(skb),
+ );
+
+ link = bpf_program__attach(prog);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "bpf_program__attach"))
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(aux_prog_fd, &topts);
+
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "test_run"))
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ break;
+ }
}
ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->err, 0, "err");
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/dynptr_fail.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/dynptr_fail.c
index 68b8c6eca5083..8f36c9de75915 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/dynptr_fail.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/dynptr_fail.c
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
#include <stdbool.h>
#include <linux/bpf.h>
#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
#include <linux/if_ether.h>
#include "bpf_misc.h"
#include "bpf_kfuncs.h"
@@ -1254,6 +1255,30 @@ int skb_invalid_ctx(void *ctx)
return 0;
}
+SEC("fentry/skb_tx_error")
+__failure __msg("must be referenced or trusted")
+int BPF_PROG(skb_invalid_ctx_fentry, void *skb)
+{
+ struct bpf_dynptr ptr;
+
+ /* this should fail */
+ bpf_dynptr_from_skb(skb, 0, &ptr);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("fexit/skb_tx_error")
+__failure __msg("must be referenced or trusted")
+int BPF_PROG(skb_invalid_ctx_fexit, void *skb)
+{
+ struct bpf_dynptr ptr;
+
+ /* this should fail */
+ bpf_dynptr_from_skb(skb, 0, &ptr);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
/* Reject writes to dynptr slot for uninit arg */
SEC("?raw_tp")
__failure __msg("potential write to dynptr at off=-16")
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/dynptr_success.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/dynptr_success.c
index 5985920d162e7..bfcc85686cf04 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/dynptr_success.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/dynptr_success.c
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
#include <stdbool.h>
#include <linux/bpf.h>
#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
#include "bpf_misc.h"
#include "bpf_kfuncs.h"
#include "errno.h"
@@ -544,3 +545,25 @@ int test_dynptr_skb_strcmp(struct __sk_buff *skb)
return 1;
}
+
+SEC("tp_btf/kfree_skb")
+int BPF_PROG(test_dynptr_skb_tp_btf, void *skb, void *location)
+{
+ __u8 write_data[2] = {1, 2};
+ struct bpf_dynptr ptr;
+ int ret;
+
+ if (bpf_dynptr_from_skb(skb, 0, &ptr)) {
+ err = 1;
+ return 1;
+ }
+
+ /* since tp_btf skbs are read only, writes should fail */
+ ret = bpf_dynptr_write(&ptr, 0, write_data, sizeof(write_data), 0);
+ if (ret != -EINVAL) {
+ err = 2;
+ return 1;
+ }
+
+ return 1;
+}
--
2.32.0.3.g01195cf9f
Powered by blists - more mailing lists