netdev - [PATCH net-next 12/12] net: lan966x: refactor buffer reload function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240905-fdma-lan966x-v1-12-e083f8620165@microchip.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2024 10:06:40 +0200
From: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@...rochip.com>
To: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>,
	<UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo
 Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel
 Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
	"John Fastabend" <john.fastabend@...il.com>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<bpf@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 12/12] net: lan966x: refactor buffer reload
 function

Now that we store everything in the fdma structs, refactor
lan966x_fdma_reload() to store and restore the entire struct.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@...rochip.com>
Reviewed-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_fdma.c | 14 ++++----------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_fdma.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_fdma.c
index 4c8f83e4c5de..502670718104 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_fdma.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_fdma.c
@@ -810,14 +810,11 @@ static int lan966x_qsys_sw_status(struct lan966x *lan966x)
 static int lan966x_fdma_reload(struct lan966x *lan966x, int new_mtu)
 {
 	struct page_pool *page_pool;
-	dma_addr_t rx_dma;
-	void *rx_dcbs;
-	u32 size;
+	struct fdma fdma_rx_old;
 	int err;
 
 	/* Store these for later to free them */
-	rx_dma = lan966x->rx.fdma.dma;
-	rx_dcbs = lan966x->rx.fdma.dcbs;
+	memcpy(&fdma_rx_old, &lan966x->rx.fdma, sizeof(struct fdma));
 	page_pool = lan966x->rx.page_pool;
 
 	napi_synchronize(&lan966x->napi);
@@ -833,9 +830,7 @@ static int lan966x_fdma_reload(struct lan966x *lan966x, int new_mtu)
 		goto restore;
 	lan966x_fdma_rx_start(&lan966x->rx);
 
-	size = sizeof(struct fdma_dcb) * lan966x->rx.fdma.n_dcbs;
-	size = ALIGN(size, PAGE_SIZE);
-	dma_free_coherent(lan966x->dev, size, rx_dcbs, rx_dma);
+	fdma_free_coherent(lan966x->dev, &fdma_rx_old);
 
 	page_pool_destroy(page_pool);
 
@@ -845,8 +840,7 @@ static int lan966x_fdma_reload(struct lan966x *lan966x, int new_mtu)
 	return err;
 restore:
 	lan966x->rx.page_pool = page_pool;
-	lan966x->rx.fdma.dma = rx_dma;
-	lan966x->rx.fdma.dcbs = rx_dcbs;
+	memcpy(&lan966x->rx.fdma, &fdma_rx_old, sizeof(struct fdma));
 	lan966x_fdma_rx_start(&lan966x->rx);
 
 	return err;

-- 
2.34.1