lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20240905164447.GA391162@bhelgaas> Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2024 11:44:47 -0500 From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org> To: Wei Huang <wei.huang2@....com> Cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com, corbet@....net, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, alex.williamson@...hat.com, gospo@...adcom.com, michael.chan@...adcom.com, ajit.khaparde@...adcom.com, somnath.kotur@...adcom.com, andrew.gospodarek@...adcom.com, manoj.panicker2@....com, Eric.VanTassell@....com, vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev, horms@...nel.org, bagasdotme@...il.com, bhelgaas@...gle.com, lukas@...ner.de, paul.e.luse@...el.com, jing2.liu@...el.com Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 00/12] PCIe TPH and cache direct injection support On Thu, Sep 05, 2024 at 10:45:57AM -0500, Wei Huang wrote: > On 9/4/24 15:20, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > To me, this series would make more sense if we squashed these > > together: > > > > PCI: Introduce PCIe TPH support framework > > PCI: Add TPH related register definition > > PCI/TPH: Add pcie_enable_tph() to enable TPH > > PCI/TPH: Add pcie_disable_tph() to disable TPH > > PCI/TPH: Add save/restore support for TPH > > > > These would add the "minimum viable functionality", e.g., enable TPH > > just for Processing Hints, with no Steering Tag support at all. Would > > also include "pci=notph". > > > PCI/TPH: Add pcie_tph_set_st_entry() to set ST tag > > PCI/TPH: Add pcie_tph_get_cpu_st() to get ST tag > > > > And squash these also to add Steering Tag support in a single commit, > > including enhancing the save/restore. > > Can you elaborate on save/restore enhancement? Assuming that the first > combined patch will have save/restore support as suggested. Are you > talking about the ST entries save/restore as the enhancements (see > below), because the second combined patch deals with ST? > > st_entry = (u16 *)cap; > offset = PCI_TPH_BASE_SIZEOF; > num_entries = get_st_table_size(pdev); > for (i = 0; i < num_entries; i++) { > pci_write_config_word(pdev, pdev->tph_cap + offset, > *st_entry++); > offset += sizeof(u16); > } I meant that since the first patch knows nothing about ST, it would save/restore TPH control but not the ST entries. The second patch would add ST support and also add save/restore of the ST entries.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists