lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAKxU2N_gu-_aEOZ6U1wVF4D-qw9gCCe8-0VxNvJAu9aOTc0F+g@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2024 15:28:05 -0700 From: Rosen Penev <rosenp@...il.com> To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jacob.e.keller@...el.com, horms@...nel.org, sd@...asysnail.net, chunkeey@...il.com Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 net-next 9/9] net: ibm: emac: get rid of wol_irq On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 2:27 PM Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 05, 2024 at 01:15:06PM -0700, Rosen Penev wrote: > > This is completely unused. > > > > Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev <rosenp@...il.com> > > Seems reasonable, since there does not appear to be any WoL > support. > > However, it might be possible to wire it up? You might then need the > interrupt? This patch could then be reverted if it is actually needed. I have no idea how to do so. Actually the device I have probably doesn't support WoL. I'll leave that for someone else to figure out. > > Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> > > Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists