[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240904185848.19a7f588@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 18:58:48 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, Madhu Chittim
<madhu.chittim@...el.com>, Sridhar Samudrala <sridhar.samudrala@...el.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Sunil Kovvuri Goutham <sgoutham@...vell.com>, Jamal Hadi Salim
<jhs@...atatu.com>, Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@...il.com>,
anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com, przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, edumazet@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 net-next 14/15] iavf: Add net_shaper_ops support
On Wed, 4 Sep 2024 15:53:46 +0200 Paolo Abeni wrote:
> +static int iavf_verify_handle(struct net_shaper_binding *binding,
> + const struct net_shaper_handle *handle,
> + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> +{
> + struct iavf_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(binding->netdev);
> + int qid = handle->id;
> +
> + if (qid >= adapter->num_active_queues) {
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_FMT(extack, "Invalid shaper handle, queued id %d max %d",
> + qid, adapter->num_active_queues);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
This can go once we have the real_num validation in the core?
Otherwise LGTM!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists