netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] selftests/net: integrate packetdrill with ksft

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240905184204.797a4c49@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2024 18:42:04 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
 pabeni@...hat.com, ncardwell@...gle.com, shuah@...nel.org,
 linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, fw@...len.de, Willem de Bruijn
 <willemb@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] selftests/net: integrate packetdrill with
 ksft

On Thu, 05 Sep 2024 21:31:55 -0400 Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> > Packetdrill scripts are sensitive to timing.
> > On the dbg build, I just observe a flaky test.
> > 
> > The tool takes --tolerance_usecs and --tolerance_percent arguments.
> > I may have to update ksft_runner.sh to increase one if a dbg build is
> > detected.
> > 
> > Let me know if I should respin now. Else I can also follow-up.
> > 
> > Need to figure out how best to detect debug builds. It is not in
> > uname, and no proc/config.gz. Existence of /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak
> > is a proxy for current kernel/configs/debug.config, if a bit crude.  
> 
> Should have kept on reading. Will use KSFT_MACHINE_SLOW:
> 
> +declare -a optargs
> +if [[ "${KSFT_MACHINE_SLOW}" == "yes" ]]; then
> +       optargs+=('--tolerance_usecs=10000')
> +fi
> +
>  ktap_print_header
>  ktap_set_plan 2
> 
> -packetdrill ${ipv4_args[@]} $(basename $script) > /dev/null \
> +packetdrill ${ipv4_args[@]} ${optargs[@]} $(basename $script) > /dev/null \
>         && ktap_test_pass "ipv4" || ktap_test_fail "ipv4"
> -packetdrill ${ipv6_args[@]} $(basename $script) > /dev/null \
> +packetdrill ${ipv6_args[@]} ${optargs[@]} $(basename $script) > /dev/null \
>         && ktap_test_pass "ipv6" || ktap_test_fail "ipv6"
> 
> 
> > Another config affecting timing may be CONFIG_HZ. I did not observe
> > issues with these specific scripts with CONFIG_HZ=250. It may have to
> > be tackled eventually. Or CONFIG_HZ=1000 hardcoded in config.  
>  
> I will just add the CONFIG for now.

Not sure I follow the HZ idea, lowering the frequency helps stability?

We can see how well v2 does overnight, so far it's green:
https://netdev.bots.linux.dev/contest.html?executor=vmksft-packetdrill-dbg
(the net-next-2024-09-05--* branches had v1).

FWIW status page lists two sets of packetdrill runners, probably 
because I 'reused' an old team-driver runner instead of creating
a new one. It should straighten itself out by tomorrow.