lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <0a12953b-0d11-00d2-ef0e-454d0e3d98f3@huawei.com> Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2024 10:35:08 +0800 From: yukaixiong <yukaixiong@...wei.com> To: <"wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com liushixin2@...wei.com liuyongqiang13@...wei.com tongtiangen@...wei.com sunnanyong@...wei.com mawupeng1@...wei.com zuoze1@...wei.com zhangpeng362@...wei.com tujinjiang@...wei.com yaolulu5"@huawei.com> CC: <guohanjun@...wei.com>, <ysato@...rs.osdn.me>, <dalias@...c.org>, <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>, <luto@...nel.org>, <tglx@...utronix.de>, <bp@...en8.de>, <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, <hpa@...or.com>, <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, <brauner@...nel.org>, <jack@...e.cz>, <kees@...nel.org>, <willy@...radead.org>, <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>, <vbabka@...e.cz>, <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>, <trondmy@...nel.org>, <anna@...nel.org>, <chuck.lever@...cle.com>, <jlayton@...nel.org>, <neilb@...e.de>, <okorniev@...hat.com>, <Dai.Ngo@...cle.com>, <tom@...pey.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>, <paul@...l-moore.com>, <jmorris@...ei.org>, <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>, <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>, <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 -next 00/15] sysctl: move sysctls from vm_table into its own files On 2024/9/4 4:38, Joel Granados wrote: > On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 11:29:56AM +0800, Kaixiong Yu wrote: >> This patch series moves sysctls of vm_table in kernel/sysctl.c to >> places where they actually belong, and do some related code clean-ups. >> After this patch series, all sysctls in vm_table have been moved into its >> own files, meanwhile, delete vm_table. >> >> All the modifications of this patch series base on >> linux-next(tags/next-20240902). To test this patch series, the code was >> compiled with both the CONFIG_SYSCTL enabled and disabled on arm64 and >> x86_64 architectures. After this patch series is applied, all files >> under /proc/sys/vm can be read or written normally. > This move make a lot of sense. The question with these multi-subsystem > patchsets is how do they go into mainline. For now I have added this to > sysctl-testing to see if it needs more work. I can push this through the > sysctl subsystem, but you need to get reviewed-by for all of the commits > in different subsystems. I'm also fine with this going in through some > other subsys if anyone wants to take it? > > Best > Thx,Joel!:-) Hello,everyone! This patch series has been reviewed by Kees, Jan Kara, Christian Brauner, and acked by Anna Schumaker, Paul Moore. As Joel said, this patch series need to get reviewed-by for all of the commits in different subsystems. I would appreciate it if you could review this patch series as soon as possible !:-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists