netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 6/9] net: netconsole: track explicitly if msgbody was written to buffer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240906-tremendous-intelligent-slug-fdd3cb@devvm32600>
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2024 01:37:05 -0700
From: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Cc: kuba@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
	pabeni@...hat.com, thepacketgeek@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, davej@...emonkey.org.uk,
	thevlad@...a.com, max@...sevol.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 6/9] net: netconsole: track explicitly if
 msgbody was written to buffer

On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 12:07:26PM +0100, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 07:07:49AM -0700, Breno Leitao wrote:
> > The current check to determine if the message body was fully sent is
> > difficult to follow. To improve clarity, introduce a variable that
> > explicitly tracks whether the message body (msgbody) has been completely
> > sent, indicating when it's time to begin sending userdata.
> > 
> > Additionally, add comments to make the code more understandable for
> > others who may work with it.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> The nit below notwithstanding this looks good to me.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
> 
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/netconsole.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
> >  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/netconsole.c b/drivers/net/netconsole.c
> > index 22ccd9aa016a..c8a23a7684e5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/netconsole.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/netconsole.c
> > @@ -1102,6 +1102,7 @@ static void send_msg_fragmented(struct netconsole_target *nt,
> >  	 */
> >  	while (offset < body_len) {
> >  		int this_header = header_len;
> > +		bool msgbody_written = false;
> >  		int this_offset = 0;
> >  		int this_chunk = 0;
> >  
> > @@ -1119,12 +1120,22 @@ static void send_msg_fragmented(struct netconsole_target *nt,
> >  			memcpy(buf + this_header, msgbody + offset, this_chunk);
> >  			this_offset += this_chunk;
> >  		}
> > +
> > +		if (offset + this_offset >= msgbody_len)
> > +			/* msgbody was finally written, either in the previous messages
> > +			 * and/or in the current buf. Time to write the userdata.
> > +			 */
> 
> Please consider keeping comments <= 80 columns wide.
> Likewise in other patches of this series.
> 
> checkpatch can be run with an option to check for this.

Thanks for the heads-up. I've just added `--max-line-length=80` to my
checkpatch by default

Thanks