[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d1e114ca-aa81-4e7f-b5ab-38656b205a33@ti.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 18:43:48 +0530
From: "Anwar, Md Danish" <a0501179@...com>
To: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...nel.org>, MD Danish Anwar <danishanwar@...com>,
<robh@...nel.org>, <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>,
<dan.carpenter@...aro.org>, <saikrishnag@...vell.com>,
<andrew@...n.ch>, <javier.carrasco.cruz@...il.com>,
<jacob.e.keller@...el.com>, <diogo.ivo@...mens.com>,
<horms@...nel.org>, <richardcochran@...il.com>, <pabeni@...hat.com>,
<kuba@...nel.org>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <srk@...com>,
Vignesh Raghavendra
<vigneshr@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 3/5] net: ti: icssg-prueth: Add support for
HSR frame forward offload
Hi Roger,
On 9/10/2024 5:42 PM, Roger Quadros wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 06/09/2024 14:15, MD Danish Anwar wrote:
>> Add support for offloading HSR port-to-port frame forward to hardware.
>> When the slave interfaces are added to the HSR interface, the PRU cores
>> will be stopped and ICSSG HSR firmwares will be loaded to them.
>>
>> Similarly, when HSR interface is deleted, the PRU cores will be
>> restarted and the last used firmwares will be reloaded. PRUeth
>> interfaces will be back to the last used mode.
>>
>> This commit also renames some APIs that are common between switch and
>> hsr mode with '_fw_offload' suffix.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: MD Danish Anwar <danishanwar@...com>
>> ---
>> .../net/ethernet/ti/icssg/icssg_classifier.c | 1 +
>> drivers/net/ethernet/ti/icssg/icssg_config.c | 18 +--
>> drivers/net/ethernet/ti/icssg/icssg_prueth.c | 132 +++++++++++++++++-
>> drivers/net/ethernet/ti/icssg/icssg_prueth.h | 6 +
>> 4 files changed, 145 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/icssg/icssg_classifier.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/icssg/icssg_classifier.c
>> index 9ec504d976d6..833ca86d0b71 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/icssg/icssg_classifier.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/icssg/icssg_classifier.c
>
> <snip>
>
>> +static void emac_change_hsr_feature(struct net_device *ndev,
>> + netdev_features_t features,
>> + u64 hsr_feature)
>> +{
>> + netdev_features_t changed = ndev->features ^ features;
>> +
>> + if (changed & hsr_feature) {
>> + if (features & hsr_feature)
>> + ndev->features |= hsr_feature;
>> + else
>> + ndev->features &= ~hsr_feature;
>
> You are not supposed to change ndev->features here.
>
> From
> "https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/networking/netdev-features.txt"
> "
> * ndo_set_features:
>
> Hardware should be reconfigured to match passed feature set. The set
> should not be altered unless some error condition happens that can't
> be reliably detected in ndo_fix_features. In this case, the callback
> should update netdev->features to match resulting hardware state.
> Errors returned are not (and cannot be) propagated anywhere except dmesg.
> (Note: successful return is zero, >0 means silent error.)"
>
> This means only in
>
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int emac_ndo_set_features(struct net_device *ndev,
>> + netdev_features_t features)
>> +{
>> + emac_change_hsr_feature(ndev, features, NETIF_F_HW_HSR_FWD);
>> + emac_change_hsr_feature(ndev, features, NETIF_F_HW_HSR_DUP);
>> + emac_change_hsr_feature(ndev, features, NETIF_F_HW_HSR_TAG_INS);
>> + emac_change_hsr_feature(ndev, features, NETIF_F_HW_HSR_TAG_RM);
>
> I don't understand this part.
>
> As you are not changing hardware state in ndo_set_features, I'm not sure why
> you even need ndo_set_features callback.
>
We don't need to do any hardware configuration when the feature is
changed. Instead certain APIs will do certain actions based on which HSR
related feature is set in ndev->features. I agree this makes the whole
API redundant. Previously in v3
(https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240828091901.3120935-4-danishanwar@ti.com/)
also this API was essentially just changing ndev->features when hsr
change was requested.
+static int emac_ndo_set_features(struct net_device *ndev,
+ netdev_features_t features)
+{
...
+
+ if (hsr_change_request)
+ ndev->features = features;
+
+ return 0;
+}
I think it would be better to drop this call back in the driver as no
action is needed in the hardware based on what feature is set here.
> You didn't take my feedback about using ndo_fix_features().
>
Roger, I have taken your feedback regarding ndo_fix_features() and
implemented it in the next patch (patch 4/5
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240906111538.1259418-5-danishanwar@ti.com/).
Please have a look at that patch also. The features that have
dependencies that can be addressed in ndo_fix_features, are not
introduced in this patch so I have not introduced the function here. It
is getting introduced in the next patch.
> Please read this.
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/networking/netdev-features.txt
> "Part II: Controlling enabled features"
> "Part III: Implementation hints"
>
> Also look at how _netdev_update_features() works and calls ndo_fix_features()
> and ndo_set_features()
>
Thanks for this. I checked that. Based on how _netdev_update_features()
is implemented, I don't think there is any need of ndo_set_features.
Whatever hardware dependencies are related to these HSR features, can be
taken care by ndo_fix_features.
Please let me know how does this look to you.
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.11-rc7/source/net/core/dev.c#L10023
>
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> static const struct net_device_ops emac_netdev_ops = {
>> .ndo_open = emac_ndo_open,
>> .ndo_stop = emac_ndo_stop,
>> @@ -737,6 +780,7 @@ static const struct net_device_ops emac_netdev_ops = {
>> .ndo_eth_ioctl = icssg_ndo_ioctl,
>> .ndo_get_stats64 = icssg_ndo_get_stats64,
>> .ndo_get_phys_port_name = icssg_ndo_get_phys_port_name,
>> + .ndo_set_features = emac_ndo_set_features,
>> };
>
> <snip>
>
--
Thanks and Regards,
Md Danish Anwar
Powered by blists - more mailing lists