netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v3 0/6][pull request] idpf: XDP chapter II: convert Tx completion to libeth

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <13dd3449-6a28-3fa3-cfde-1a34b537ed19@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 16:05:32 -0700
From: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: <davem@...emloft.net>, <pabeni@...hat.com>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>,
	<przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>, <joshua.a.hay@...el.com>,
	<michal.kubiak@...el.com>, <nex.sw.ncis.osdt.itp.upstreaming@...el.com>,
	<willemb@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 0/6][pull request] idpf: XDP chapter II:
 convert Tx completion to libeth



On 9/10/2024 2:44 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Sep 2024 09:46:57 -0700 Tony Nguyen wrote:
>>> You're posting two series at once, again. I was going to merge the
>>> subfunction series yesterday, but since you don't wait why would
>>> I bother trying to merge your code quickly.
>>
>> I thought last month's vacations were over as I had seen Eric and Paolo
>> on the list and that things were returning to normal.
> 
> Stubbornly people continue to take vacations, have babies etc.
> But that's besides the point.
> 
> Either we are merging stuff quickly, and there's no need to queue two
> series, or we're backed up due to absences and you should wait.
> 
> The rule of 15 patches at a time is about breaking work up as much as
> throttling.  Up to outstanding 15 patches to each tree.
> I find it hard to believe you don't know this.

Honestly I didn't, but will follow this now that I do.

>>> And this morning I got
>>> chased by Thorsten about Intel regressions, again:
>>>    https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219143
>>
>> Our client team, who works on that driver, was working on that issue.
>> I will check in with them.
>>
>>> Do you have anything else queued up?
>>> I'm really tempted to ask you to not post anything else for net-next
>>> this week.
>>
>> I do have more patches that need to be sent, but it's more than can fit
>> in the time that's left. There are 1 or 2 more that I was hoping to get
>> in before net-next closed or Plumbers starts.
> 
> Higher prio stuff (read: exclusively authored by people who were
> actively reviewing upstream (non-Intel) code within last 3 months)
> may be able to get applied in time. We have 250 outstanding patches
> right now, and just 3 days to go.

I'll hold off on sending those then and try to get us more involved in 
the future.

Thanks,
Tony