netdev - [PATCH 20/24] timekeeping: Rework timekeeping_resume() to use shadow

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20240911-devel-anna-maria-b4-timers-ptp-timekeeping-v1-20-f7cae09e25d6@linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 15:30:04 +0200
From: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
To: John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>, 
 Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>, 
 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, 
 Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@...hat.com>, 
 Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>, 
 Christopher S Hall <christopher.s.hall@...el.com>, 
 Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH 20/24] timekeeping: Rework timekeeping_resume() to use
 shadow_timekeeper

Updates of the timekeeper can be done by operating on the shadow timekeeper
and afterwards copying the result into the real timekeeper. This has the
advantage, that the sequence count write protected region is kept as small
as possible.

While the sequence count held time is not relevant for the resume path as
there is no concurrency, there is no reason to have this function
different than all the other update sites.

Convert timekeeping_inject_offset() to use this scheme and cleanup the
variable declaration while at it.

Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
---
 kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 10 ++++------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
index 244bb58dcda9..d4a0d37f88f5 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
@@ -1912,12 +1912,12 @@ void timekeeping_inject_sleeptime64(const struct timespec64 *delta)
  */
 void timekeeping_resume(void)
 {
-	struct timekeeper *tk = &tk_core.timekeeper;
+	struct timekeeper *tk = &tk_core.shadow_timekeeper;
 	struct clocksource *clock = tk->tkr_mono.clock;
-	unsigned long flags;
 	struct timespec64 ts_new, ts_delta;
-	u64 cycle_now, nsec;
 	bool inject_sleeptime = false;
+	u64 cycle_now, nsec;
+	unsigned long flags;
 
 	read_persistent_clock64(&ts_new);
 
@@ -1925,7 +1925,6 @@ void timekeeping_resume(void)
 	clocksource_resume();
 
 	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&tk_core.lock, flags);
-	write_seqcount_begin(&tk_core.seq);
 
 	/*
 	 * After system resumes, we need to calculate the suspended time and
@@ -1960,8 +1959,7 @@ void timekeeping_resume(void)
 
 	tk->ntp_error = 0;
 	timekeeping_suspended = 0;
-	timekeeping_update(&tk_core, tk, TK_MIRROR | TK_CLOCK_WAS_SET);
-	write_seqcount_end(&tk_core.seq);
+	timekeeping_update_staged(&tk_core, TK_CLOCK_WAS_SET);
 	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tk_core.lock, flags);
 
 	touch_softlockup_watchdog();

-- 
2.39.2