netdev - Re: [PATCH hotfix 6.11 v2 3/3] minmax: reduce min/max macro expansion in atomisp driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHk-=wgWJmQJSWz_5S8ZqEpDs1t3Abym9DPZfUzWu+OCNM3igw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 11:11:25 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Richard Narron <richard@...zen.com>, 
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, 
	Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>, 
	Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>, 
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Marcin Wojtas <marcin.s.wojtas@...il.com>, 
	Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, 
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, 
	linux-mm@...ck.org, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, 
	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH hotfix 6.11 v2 3/3] minmax: reduce min/max macro expansion
 in atomisp driver

On Wed, 11 Sept 2024 at 10:51, Lorenzo Stoakes
<lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com> wrote:
>
> Avoid unnecessary nested min()/max() which results in egregious macro
> expansion. Use clamp_t() as this introduces the least possible expansion.

I took this (single) patch directly, since that's the one that
actually causes build problems in limited environments (admittedly not
in current git with the more invasive min/max cleanups, but in order
to be back-ported).

Plus it cleans up the code with more legible inline functions, rather
than just doing some minimal syntactic changes. I expanded on the
commit message to say that.

The two others I'll leave for now and see what maintainers of their
respective areas think.

            Linus