lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <SJ0PR11MB58667498DF7BDDFFC29DA1F6E59B2@SJ0PR11MB5866.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 19:12:13 +0000
From: "Loktionov, Aleksandr" <aleksandr.loktionov@...el.com>
To: Kamal Heib <kheib@...hat.com>
CC: YangHang Liu <yanghliu@...hat.com>, Chao Yang <chayang@...hat.com>,
	ivecera <ivecera@...hat.com>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org"
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, "Nguyen, Anthony
 L" <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>, "Kitszel, Przemyslaw"
	<przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>, "intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org"
	<intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, "David S
 . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net] i40e: Fix trying to free
 already-freed IRQ



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kamal Heib <kheib@...hat.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2024 7:52 PM
> To: Loktionov, Aleksandr <aleksandr.loktionov@...el.com>
> Cc: YangHang Liu <yanghliu@...hat.com>; Chao Yang
> <chayang@...hat.com>; ivecera <ivecera@...hat.com>;
> netdev@...r.kernel.org; Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>; Nguyen,
> Anthony L <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>; Kitszel, Przemyslaw
> <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>; intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org;
> Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>; David S . Miller
> <davem@...emloft.net>
> Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net] i40e: Fix trying to
> free already-freed IRQ
> 
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 08:50:39AM +0000, Loktionov, Aleksandr wrote:
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Loktionov, Aleksandr
> > > Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2024 10:35 AM
> > > To: Kamal Heib <kheib@...hat.com>
> > > Cc: YangHang Liu <yanghliu@...hat.com>; Chao Yang
> > > <chayang@...hat.com>; ivecera <ivecera@...hat.com>;
> > > netdev@...r.kernel.org; Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>; Nguyen,
> > > Anthony L <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>; Kitszel, Przemyslaw
> > > <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>; intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org;
> > > Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>; David S . Miller
> > > <davem@...emloft.net>
> > > Subject: RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net] i40e: Fix trying to
> > > free already-freed IRQ
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Kamal Heib <kheib@...hat.com>
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2024 4:15 AM
> > > > To: Loktionov, Aleksandr <aleksandr.loktionov@...el.com>
> > > > Cc: YangHang Liu <yanghliu@...hat.com>; Chao Yang
> > > > <chayang@...hat.com>; ivecera <ivecera@...hat.com>;
> > > > netdev@...r.kernel.org; Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>;
> Nguyen,
> > > > Anthony L <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>; Kitszel, Przemyslaw
> > > > <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>; intel-wired-
> lan@...ts.osuosl.org;
> > > > Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>; David S . Miller
> > > > <davem@...emloft.net>
> > > > Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net] i40e: Fix trying
> to
> > > > free already-freed IRQ
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Sep 05, 2024 at 07:51:15AM +0000, Loktionov, Aleksandr
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: Kamal Heib <kheib@...hat.com>
> > > > > > Sent: Thursday, September 5, 2024 1:57 AM
> > > > > > To: Loktionov, Aleksandr <aleksandr.loktionov@...el.com>
> > > > > > Cc: YangHang Liu <yanghliu@...hat.com>; Chao Yang
> > > > > > <chayang@...hat.com>; ivecera <ivecera@...hat.com>;
> > > > > > netdev@...r.kernel.org; Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>;
> > > Nguyen,
> > > > > > Anthony L <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>; Kitszel, Przemyslaw
> > > > > > <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>; intel-wired-
> > > lan@...ts.osuosl.org;
> > > > > > Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>; David S . Miller
> > > > > > <davem@...emloft.net>
> > > > > > Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net] i40e: Fix
> > > > > > trying
> > > to
> > > > > > free already-freed IRQ
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 09:00:32PM +0000, Loktionov,
> Aleksandr
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > > From: Intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan-
> bounces@...osl.org>
> > > On
> > > > > > Behalf
> > > > > > > > Of YangHang Liu
> > > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, September 4, 2024 4:37 AM
> > > > > > > > To: Kamal Heib <kheib@...hat.com>; Chao Yang
> > > > > > > > <chayang@...hat.com>
> > > > > > > > Cc: ivecera <ivecera@...hat.com>;
> netdev@...r.kernel.org;
> > > > Jakub
> > > > > > > > Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>; Nguyen, Anthony L
> > > > > > > > <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>; Kitszel, Przemyslaw
> > > > > > > > <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>;
> > > > > > > > intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org; Paolo Abeni
> > > > > > > > <pabeni@...hat.com>; David S . Miller
> > > > > > > > <davem@...emloft.net>
> > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net] i40e: Fix
> > > > trying
> > > > > > > > to free already-freed IRQ
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > This issue can be reproduced by hot-unplugging the INTx
> > > > > > > > i40e
> > > > PF.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The Call Trace will disappear after using Kamal's fix.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Tested-by: Yanghang Liu<yanghliu@...hat.com>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 2:26 AM Kamal Heib
> > > > > > > > <kheib@...hat.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Avoid the following warning when trying to free an
> > > > > > > > > already freed
> > > > > > > > IRQ,
> > > > > > > > > The issue happens when trying to call i40e_remove()
> > > > > > > > > twice
> > > > from
> > > > > > two
> > > > > > > > > different contexts which will lead to calling
> > > > > > i40e_vsi_free_irq()
> > > > > > > > > twice, Fix the issue by using a flag to mark that the
> > > > > > > > > IRQ
> > > > has
> > > > > > > > already been freed.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > i40e 0000:07:00.0: i40e_ptp_stop: removed PHC on
> enp7s0
> > > > > > > > > ------------
> > > > > > > > [
> > > > > > > > > cut here ]------------ Trying to free already-free IRQ
> 0
> > > > > > > > > WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 12 at kernel/irq/manage.c:1868
> > > > > > > > > __free_irq+0x1e3/0x350 Modules linked in: nft_fib_inet
> > > > > > > > > nft_fib_ipv4
> > > > > > > > > nft_fib_ipv6 nft_fib nft_reject_inet nf_reject_ipv4
> > > > > > nf_reject_ipv6
> > > > > > > > > nft_reject nft_ct nft_chain_nat nf_nat nf_conntrack
> > > > > > nf_defrag_ipv6
> > > > > > > > > nf_defrag_ipv4 rfkill ip_set nf_tables nfnetlink vfat
> > > > > > > > > fat intel_rapl_msr intel_rapl_common kvm_amd ccp
> > > > > > > > > iTCO_wdt iTCO_vendor_support kvm i2c_i801 pcspkr i40e
> > > > > > > > > lpc_ich virtio_gpu i2c_smbus virtio_dma_buf
> > > > > > > > > drm_shmem_helper drm_kms_helper virtio_balloon joydev
> > > > > > > > > drm fuse xfs
> > > libcrc32c
> > > > > > > > > ahci
> > > > > > crct10dif_pclmul
> > > > > > > > > libahci crc32_pclmul crc32c_intel virtio_net libata
> > > > virtio_blk
> > > > > > > > > ghash_clmulni_intel net_failover virtio_console
> failover
> > > > > > serio_raw
> > > > > > > > > dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod
> > > > > > > > > CPU: 2 PID: 12 Comm: kworker/u16:1 Kdump: loaded Not
> > > tainted
> > > > > > > > > 5.14.0-478.el9.x86_64 #1 Hardware name: Red Hat
> > > > > > > > > KVM/RHEL,
> > > > BIOS
> > > > > > > > > edk2-20240524-1.el9 05/24/2024
> > > > > > > > > Workqueue: kacpi_hotplug acpi_hotplug_work_fn
> > > > > > > > > RIP: 0010:__free_irq+0x1e3/0x350
> > > > > > > > > Code: 00 00 48 8b bb a8 01 00 00 e8 09 74 02 00 49 8b
> 7c
> > > 24
> > > > 30
> > > > > > e8
> > > > > > > > > 8f 7c 1d 00 eb 35 8b 74 24 04 48 c7 c7 50 a3 61 92 e8
> cd
> > > 99
> > > > f6
> > > > > > ff
> > > > > > > > > <0f>
> > > > > > > > 0b
> > > > > > > > > 4c 89 fe 48 89 ef e8 30 aa b3 00 48 8b 43 40 48 8b 40
> 78
> > > 48
> > > > > > > > > RSP: 0018:ffffb971c0077ac8 EFLAGS: 00010086
> > > > > > > > > RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8b594193ee00 RCX:
> > > > > > 0000000000000027
> > > > > > > > > RDX: 0000000000000027 RSI: 00000000ffff7fff RDI:
> > > > > > ffff8b59bcf208c8
> > > > > > > > > RBP: ffff8b594193eec4 R08: 0000000000000000 R09:
> > > > > > ffffb971c0077970
> > > > > > > > > R10: ffffb971c0077968 R11: ffffffff931e7c28 R12:
> > > > > > ffff8b5944946000
> > > > > > > > > R13: ffff8b594193ef80 R14: ffff8b5944946000 R15:
> > > > > > 0000000000000246
> > > > > > > > > FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8b59bcf00000(0000)
> > > > > > > > > knlGS:0000000000000000
> > > > > > > > > CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> > > > > > > > > CR2: 00007f11eb064000 CR3: 000000000ad40004 CR4:
> > > > > > 0000000000770ef0
> > > > > > > > > PKRU: 55555554
> > > > > > > > > Call Trace:
> > > > > > > > >  <TASK>
> > > > > > > > >  ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
> > > > > > > > >  ? show_trace_log_lvl+0x26e/0x2df  ?
> > > > > > > > > show_trace_log_lvl+0x26e/0x2df  ? free_irq+0x33/0x70
> ?
> > > > > > > > > __free_irq+0x1e3/0x350  ? __warn+0x7e/0xd0  ?
> > > > > > > > > __free_irq+0x1e3/0x350  ? report_bug+0x100/0x140  ?
> > > > > > > > > srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
> > > > > > > > >  ? handle_bug+0x3c/0x70
> > > > > > > > >  ? exc_invalid_op+0x14/0x70  ?
> > > > > > > > > asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20  ? __free_irq+0x1e3/0x350
> > > ?
> > > > > > > > > __free_irq+0x1e3/0x350
> > > > > > > > >  free_irq+0x33/0x70
> > > > > > > > >  i40e_vsi_free_irq+0x19e/0x220 [i40e]
> > > > > > > > >  i40e_vsi_close+0x2b/0xc0 [i40e]
> > > > > > > > >  i40e_close+0x11/0x20 [i40e]
> > > > > > > > >  __dev_close_many+0x9e/0x110
> > > > > > > > >  dev_close_many+0x8b/0x140  ?
> > > > > > > > > srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
> > > > > > > > >  ? free_pcppages_bulk+0xee/0x290
> > > > > > > > >  unregister_netdevice_many_notify+0x162/0x690
> > > > > > > > >  ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
> > > > > > > > >  ? free_unref_page_commit+0x19a/0x310
> > > > > > > > >  unregister_netdevice_queue+0xd3/0x110
> > > > > > > > >  unregister_netdev+0x18/0x20
> > > > > > > > >  i40e_vsi_release+0x84/0x2e0 [i40e]  ?
> > > > > > > > > srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
> > > > > > > > >  i40e_remove+0x15c/0x430 [i40e]
> > > > > > > > >  pci_device_remove+0x3e/0xb0
> > > > > > > > >  device_release_driver_internal+0x193/0x200
> > > > > > > > >  pci_stop_bus_device+0x6c/0x90
> > > > > > > > >  pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device+0xe/0x20
> > > > > > > > >  disable_slot+0x49/0x90
> > > > > > > > >  acpiphp_disable_and_eject_slot+0x15/0x90
> > > > > > > > >  hotplug_event+0xea/0x210  ?
> > > > > > > > > __pfx_acpiphp_hotplug_notify+0x10/0x10
> > > > > > > > >  acpiphp_hotplug_notify+0x22/0x80  ?
> > > > > > > > > __pfx_acpiphp_hotplug_notify+0x10/0x10
> > > > > > > > >  acpi_device_hotplug+0xb8/0x210
> > > > > > > > >  acpi_hotplug_work_fn+0x1a/0x30
> > > > > > > > >  process_one_work+0x197/0x380
> > > > > > > > >  worker_thread+0x2fe/0x410  ?
> > > > > > > > > __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
> > > > > > > > >  kthread+0xe0/0x100
> > > > > > > > >  ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
> > > > > > > > >  ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x50  </TASK> ---[ end trace
> > > > > > > > > 0000000000000000 ]---
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Fixes: 41c445ff0f48 ("i40e: main driver core")
> > > > > > > > > Tested-by: YangHang Liu <yanghliu@...hat.com>
> > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Kamal Heib <kheib@...hat.com>
> > > > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > > >  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e.h      | 1 +
> > > > > > > > >  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c | 8
> > > > > > > > > ++++++++
> > > > > > > > >  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e.h
> > > > > > > > > b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e.h
> > > > > > > > > index d546567e0286..910415116995 100644
> > > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e.h
> > > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e.h
> > > > > > > > > @@ -865,6 +865,7 @@ struct i40e_vsi {
> > > > > > > > >         int num_q_vectors;
> > > > > > > > >         int base_vector;
> > > > > > > > >         bool irqs_ready;
> > > > > > > > > +       bool legacy_msi_irq_ready;
> > > > > > > I'm against adding additional boolian var which can cause
> > > > > > > race
> > > > > > conditions.
> > > > > > > Use I40E_FLAG_MSIX_ENA or at least add additional bit and
> > > > > > > use
> > > > > > interlock test_and_clean/test_and_set bit functions instead.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Aleksandr,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks for your review!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This patch was inspired by the use of "irqs_ready" boolian
> > > > > > flag
> > > in
> > > > > > the case that I40E_FLAG_MSIX_ENA is set, Please take a look
> at
> > > the
> > > > > > following change from 2014 for more info:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 6374184672c8 ("i40e: remove irqs only when they are set up")
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'll change the patch to use your suggstion, but probably
> the
> > > use
> > > > of
> > > > > > "irqs_ready" needs to be changed too.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Kamal
> > > > >
> > > > > Thank you for pointing me to similar fix, now I see my mistake
> -
> > > > I40E_FLAG_MSIX_ENA is pf level flag.
> > > > > Now we have a race in i40e_vsi_release() v i40e_close() and
> > > probably
> > > > a better solution to use interlocked bits in i40e_vsi struct.
> > > > >
> > > > > But for me it looks like a race on higher level -  vsi states.
> > > > > If i40e_remove() already called i40e_vsi_close() then when
> > > > i40e_close() calls i40e_vsi_close() second time i40e_vsi_close()
> > > must
> > > > just bail out with nothing to do.
> > > > > Do you see my point, it's not just interrupt freeing race,
> it's
> > > vsi
> > > > state race. We need to make i40e_vsi_close() and
> > > > i40e_vsi_release() idempotent.
> > > > >
> > > > > Proper fix should be something like:
> > > > >   Add vsi_state interlocked bit-set into vsi struct.
> > > > >
> > > > >   Replace everywhere in i40e code sequence of two calls:
> > > > > 	i40e_vsi_close(pf->vsi[i]);
> > > > > 	i40e_vsi_release(pf->vsi[i]);
> > > > >   With single one:
> > > > > 	i40e_vsi_release(pf->vsi[i]);
> > > > >
> > > > > i40e_vsi_release() must interlock vsi state to prevent
> > > > > re-entrance
> > > > and double calls.
> > > > > 			must first call i40e_vsi_close()
> > > > >
> > > > > i40e_vsi_close() must interlock vsi state to prevent re-
> entrance
> > > and
> > > > double calls.
> > > > >
> > > > > From my point of view this is much closer to the proper fix.
> > > > > Introducing simple race-prone bool variable is just adding one
> > > more
> > > > timebomb.
> > > > >
> > > > > With the best regards
> > > > > Alex
> > > >
> > > > Hi Alex,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for your review and feedback!
> > > >
> > > > I've prepared the following change based on the above
> suggestion,
> > > > Could you please take a look and give your feedback:
> > > Waw, it looks almost perfect for me.
> > > Just wonder why we didn't came to such solution before.
> > >
> > But just one more thing!
> > i40e_vsi_close() and i40e_vsi_release() need to be not only
> idempotent, but synchronous too! To preserve driver logic working and
> be safe.
> > I.e. the function needs to return only when other thread returned
> from the same function.
> >
> 
> Unless I'm missing something, seems like i40e_vsi_release() is already
> calling i40e_vsi_close() or i40e_close() (which calles
> i40e_vsi_close()), please take a look at the following code from
> i40e_vsi_release()
> 
> if (vsi->type != I40E_VSI_SRIOV) {
This is not for VFs

>         if (vsi->netdev_registered) {
>                 vsi->netdev_registered = false;
>                 if (vsi->netdev) {
>                         /* results in a call to i40e_close() */
>                         unregister_netdev(vsi->netdev);
>                 }
>         } else {
>                 i40e_vsi_close(vsi);
>         }
>         i40e_vsi_disable_irq(vsi);
> }
> 
> Thanks,
> Kamal
> 
> > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e.h
> > > > b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e.h
> > > > index d546567e0286..2ed0a027ce69 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e.h
> > > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e.h
> > > > @@ -135,6 +135,7 @@ enum i40e_vsi_state {
> > > >         __I40E_VSI_REINIT_REQUESTED,
> > > >         __I40E_VSI_DOWN_REQUESTED,
> > > >         __I40E_VSI_RELEASING,
> > > > +       __I40E_VSI_CLOSING,
> > > >         /* This must be last as it determines the size of the
> > > > BITMAP */
> > > >         __I40E_VSI_STATE_SIZE__,
> > > >  };
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c
> > > > b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c
> > > > index cbcfada7b357..b883e187fc9b 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c
> > > > @@ -5233,6 +5233,10 @@ static void i40e_napi_disable_all(struct
> > > > i40e_vsi *vsi)  static void i40e_vsi_close(struct i40e_vsi *vsi)
> {
> > > >         struct i40e_pf *pf = vsi->back;
> > > > +
> > > > +       if (test_and_set_bit(__I40E_VSI_CLOSING, vsi->state))
> > > > +               return;
> > I think just returning is not enough, to preserve driver logic, here
> we need to wait until another thread will close and return only then.
> >
> > > > +
> > > >         if (!test_and_set_bit(__I40E_VSI_DOWN, vsi->state))
> > > >                 i40e_down(vsi);
> > > >         i40e_vsi_free_irq(vsi);
> > > > @@ -7422,6 +7426,7 @@ static int i40e_up_complete(struct
> i40e_vsi
> > > > *vsi)
> > > >                 return err;
> > > >
> > > >         clear_bit(__I40E_VSI_DOWN, vsi->state);
> > > > +       clear_bit(__I40E_VSI_CLOSING, vsi->state);
> > > >         i40e_napi_enable_all(vsi);
> > > >         i40e_vsi_enable_irq(vsi);
> > > >
> > > > @@ -14162,7 +14167,10 @@ int i40e_vsi_release(struct i40e_vsi
> *vsi)
> > > >                 dev_info(&pf->pdev->dev, "Can't remove PF
> VSI\n");
> > > >                 return -ENODEV;
> > > >         }
> > > Please don't forget to call void i40e_vsi_close() in this function
> > > then!
> > > From the first glance the i40e_vsi_close() call should go here.
> > >
> > > > -       set_bit(__I40E_VSI_RELEASING, vsi->state);
> > > > +
> > > > +       if (test_and_set_bit(__I40E_VSI_RELEASING, vsi->state))
> > > > +               return -ENODEV;
> > > > +
> > > But the i40e_vsi_close() call could be here, can you double check?
> > > Thank you
> > >
> > >
> > > >         uplink_seid = vsi->uplink_seid;
> > > >
> > > >         if (vsi->type != I40E_VSI_SRIOV) { @@ -16270,7 +16278,6
> @@
> > > > static void i40e_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> > > >          * adminq and hmc.
> > > >          */
> > > >         i40e_pf_for_each_vsi(pf, i, vsi) {
> > > > -               i40e_vsi_close(vsi);
> > > >                 i40e_vsi_release(vsi);
> > > >                 pf->vsi[i] = NULL;
> > > >         }
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Kamal
> > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >         u16 seid;               /* HW index of this
> VSI
> > > > > > (absolute
> > > > > > > > index) */
> > > > > > > > >         u16 id;                 /* VSI number */
> > > > > > > > > diff --git
> a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c
> > > > > > > > > b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c
> > > > > > > > > index cbcfada7b357..b39004a42df2 100644
> > > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c
> > > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c
> > > > > > > > > @@ -4630,6 +4630,9 @@ static int
> > > i40e_vsi_request_irq(struct
> > > > > > > > i40e_vsi *vsi, char *basename)
> > > > > > > > >         if (err)
> > > > > > > > >                 dev_info(&pf->pdev->dev, "request_irq
> > > > failed,
> > > > > > > > > Error %d\n", err);
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > +       if (!test_bit(I40E_FLAG_MSIX_ENA, pf->flags)
> &&
> > > > !err)
> > > > > > > > > +               vsi->legacy_msi_irq_ready = true;
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > >         return err;
> > > > > > > > >  }
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > @@ -5061,6 +5064,10 @@ static void
> > > i40e_vsi_free_irq(struct
> > > > > > > > > i40e_vsi
> > > > > > > > *vsi)
> > > > > > > > >                         }
> > > > > > > > >                 }
> > > > > > > > >         } else {
> > > > > > > > > +               if (!vsi->legacy_msi_irq_ready)
> > > > > > > > > +                       return;
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > +               vsi->legacy_msi_irq_ready = false;
> > > > > > > > >                 free_irq(pf->pdev->irq, pf);
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >                 val = rd32(hw, I40E_PFINT_LNKLST0); @@
> > > > > > > > > -11519,6
> > > > > > > > > +11526,7 @@ static int i40e_vsi_mem_alloc(struct
> i40e_pf
> > > > *pf,
> > > > > > enum
> > > > > > > > i40e_vsi_type type)
> > > > > > > > >         vsi->work_limit = I40E_DEFAULT_IRQ_WORK;
> > > > > > > > >         hash_init(vsi->mac_filter_hash);
> > > > > > > > >         vsi->irqs_ready = false;
> > > > > > > > > +       vsi->legacy_msi_irq_ready = false;
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >         if (type == I40E_VSI_MAIN) {
> > > > > > > > >                 vsi->af_xdp_zc_qps =
> > > > > > > > > bitmap_zalloc(pf->num_lan_qps, GFP_KERNEL);
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > 2.46.0
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> >

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ