| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <AD8BDB95-0B4A-435F-9813-5727305CA515@theune.cc> Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 09:39:01 +0200 From: Christian Theune <christian@...une.cc> To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com> Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>, regressions@...ts.linux.dev, stable@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, mathieu.tortuyaux@...il.com Subject: Re: Follow-up to "net: drop bad gso csum_start and offset in virtio_net_hdr" - backport for 5.15 needed Hi, I just took 5.15.166 + the 4 patches by Willem as they’re currently in the queue. The applied cleanly (which you already tested) and I can demonstrate the known error (bad gso: type: 4, size: 1428) on 5.15.166 without the patches and it’s gone on 5.15.166 with the patches. Thanks everyone! Hugs, Christian > On 10. Sep 2024, at 08:32, Christian Theune <christian@...une.cc> wrote: > > Happy to do that. I’ve blocked time tomorrow morning. > >> On 9. Sep 2024, at 22:32, Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com> wrote: >> >> Christian Theune wrote: >>> I can contribute live testing and can quickly reproduce the issue. >>> >>> If anything is there that should be tested for apart from verifying the fix, I’d be happy to try. >> >> If you perform the repro steps and verify that this solves the issue, >> that would be helpful, thanks. > > > Liebe Grüße, > Christian > > -- > Christian Theune - A97C62CE - 0179 7808366 > @theuni - christian@...une.cc > Liebe Grüße, Christian -- Christian Theune - A97C62CE - 0179 7808366 @theuni - christian@...une.cc
Powered by blists - more mailing lists