lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240912-lividly-remover-6d71b985a803@wendy>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:40:11 +0100
From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
To: Hal Feng <hal.feng@...rfivetech.com>
CC: WangYuli <wangyuli@...ontech.com>, "stable@...r.kernel.org"
	<stable@...r.kernel.org>, "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org"
	<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, "sashal@...nel.org" <sashal@...nel.org>,
	William Qiu <william.qiu@...rfivetech.com>,
	"emil.renner.berthing@...onical.com" <emil.renner.berthing@...onical.com>,
	Xingyu Wu <xingyu.wu@...rfivetech.com>, Walker Chen
	<walker.chen@...rfivetech.com>, "robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>,
	"kernel@...il.dk" <kernel@...il.dk>, "robh+dt@...nel.org"
	<robh+dt@...nel.org>, "krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org"
	<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, "conor+dt@...nel.org"
	<conor+dt@...nel.org>, "paul.walmsley@...ive.com" <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
	"palmer@...belt.com" <palmer@...belt.com>, "aou@...s.berkeley.edu"
	<aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, "devicetree@...r.kernel.org"
	<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org"
	<linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "richardcochran@...il.com"
	<richardcochran@...il.com>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.6 v2 3/4] riscv: dts: starfive: Add the nodes and pins
 of I2Srx/I2Stx0/I2Stx1

On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 10:23:09AM +0000, Hal Feng wrote:
> > On 12.09.24 10:55, WangYuli wrote:
> > +	i2srx_pins: i2srx-0 {
> > +		clk-sd-pins {
> > +			pinmux = <GPIOMUX(38, GPOUT_LOW,
> > +					      GPOEN_DISABLE,
> > +					      GPI_SYS_I2SRX_BCLK)>,
> > +				 <GPIOMUX(63, GPOUT_LOW,
> > +					      GPOEN_DISABLE,
> > +					      GPI_SYS_I2SRX_LRCK)>,
> > +				 <GPIOMUX(38, GPOUT_LOW,
> > +					      GPOEN_DISABLE,
> > +					      GPI_SYS_I2STX1_BCLK)>,
> > +				 <GPIOMUX(63, GPOUT_LOW,
> > +					      GPOEN_DISABLE,
> > +					      GPI_SYS_I2STX1_LRCK)>,
> > +				 <GPIOMUX(61, GPOUT_LOW,
> > +					      GPOEN_DISABLE,
> > +					      GPI_SYS_I2SRX_SDIN0)>;
> > +			input-enable;
> > +		};
> > +	};
> > +
> > +	i2stx1_pins: i2stx1-0 {
> > +		sd-pins {
> > +			pinmux = <GPIOMUX(44, GPOUT_SYS_I2STX1_SDO0,
> > +					      GPOEN_ENABLE,
> > +					      GPI_NONE)>;
> > +			bias-disable;
> > +			input-disable;
> > +		};
> > +	};
> > +
> > +	mclk_ext_pins: mclk-ext-0 {
> > +		mclk-ext-pins {
> > +			pinmux = <GPIOMUX(4, GPOUT_LOW,
> > +					     GPOEN_DISABLE,
> > +					     GPI_SYS_MCLK_EXT)>;
> > +			input-enable;
> > +		};
> > +	};
> > +
> >  	mmc0_pins: mmc0-0 {
> >  		 rst-pins {
> >  			pinmux = <GPIOMUX(62, GPOUT_SYS_SDIO0_RST,
> 
> The above changes had been reverted in commit e0503d47e93d in the mainline.
> Is it appropriate to merge this patch into the stable branch?
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240415125033.86909-1-hannah.peuckmann@canonical.com/

Hah, I had gone looking this morning because I had a hunch that there
was some missing fix this series didn't, but couldn't remember what it
was. I completely forgot that some of this was non-present overlay
related stuff that had had to be reverted.

So yes, if it had to be reverted in mainline, it shouldn't get
backported. Thanks for spotting that Hal.

Cheers,
Conor.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ