netdev - Re: [PATCH -next v3 1/2] posix-timers: Check timespec64 before call clock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <46efd1be-688e-ecd0-a9e1-cf5f69d0110f@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2024 20:24:58 +0800
From: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Richard Cochran
	<richardcochran@...il.com>
CC: <bryan.whitehead@...rochip.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
	<edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	<anna-maria@...utronix.de>, <frederic@...nel.org>,
	<UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>, <mbenes@...e.cz>, <jstultz@...gle.com>,
	<andrew@...n.ch>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v3 1/2] posix-timers: Check timespec64 before call
 clock_set()



On 2024/9/12 20:04, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12 2024 at 10:53, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
> 
>> On 2024/9/9 23:19, Richard Cochran wrote:
>>> On Mon, Sep 09, 2024 at 03:41:23PM +0800, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
>>>> diff --git a/kernel/time/posix-timers.c b/kernel/time/posix-timers.c
>>>> index 1cc830ef93a7..34deec619e17 100644
>>>> --- a/kernel/time/posix-timers.c
>>>> +++ b/kernel/time/posix-timers.c
>>>> @@ -1137,6 +1137,9 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(clock_settime, const clockid_t, which_clock,
>>>>  	if (get_timespec64(&new_tp, tp))
>>>>  		return -EFAULT;
>>>>  
>>>> +	if (!timespec64_valid(&new_tp))
>>>> +		return -ERANGE;
>>>
>>> Why not use timespec64_valid_settod()?
>>
>> There was already checks in following code, so it is not necessary to
>> check NULL or timespec64_valid() in ptp core and its drivers, only the
>> second patch is needed.
>>
>> 169 int do_sys_settimeofday64(const struct timespec64 *tv, const struct
>> timezone *tz)
>>  170 {
>>  171 >-------static int firsttime = 1;
>>  172 >-------int error = 0;
>>  173
>>  174 >-------if (tv && !timespec64_valid_settod(tv))
>>  175 >------->-------return -EINVAL;
> 
> How does this code validate timespecs for clock_settime(clockid) where
> clockid != CLOCK_REALTIME?

According to the man manual of clock_settime(), the other clockids are
not settable.

And in Linux kernel code, except for CLOCK_REALTIME which is defined in
posix_clocks array, the clock_set() hooks are not defined and will
return -EINVAL in SYSCALL_DEFINE2(clock_settime), so the check is not
necessary.

> 
> Thanks,
> 
>         tglx