netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 11/13] selftests: ncdevmem: Remove hard-coded queue numbers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZuNhYn7wlXddLWiO@mini-arch>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2024 14:47:14 -0700
From: Stanislav Fomichev <stfomichev@...il.com>
To: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>
Cc: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
	pabeni@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 11/13] selftests: ncdevmem: Remove hard-coded
 queue numbers

On 09/12, Mina Almasry wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 10:13 AM Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me> wrote:
> >
> > Use single last queue of the device and probe it dynamically.
> >
> 
> Can we use the last N queues, instead of 1? Or the last half of the queues?
> 
> Test coverage that we can bind multiple queues at once is important, I think.

Anything against doing this in the selftest/probe part?

if (probe) {
	if (start_queue > 1) {
		/* make sure can bind to multiple queues */
		start_queue -= 1;
		num_queues +=1;
	}
	run_devmem_tests();
	return 0;
}