lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0735aa31-3fc0-4767-9372-23509df751df@linux.dev>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2024 12:19:05 -0400
From: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@...ux.dev>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
 Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: Handle threadirqs in __napi_schedule_irqoff

On 9/13/24 12:14, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2024-09-13 11:09:54 [-0400], Sean Anderson wrote:
>> The threadirqs kernel parameter can be used to force threaded IRQs even
>> on non-PREEMPT_RT kernels. Use force_irqthreads to determine if we can
>> skip disabling local interrupts. This defaults to false on regular
>> kernels, and is always true on PREEMPT_RT kernels.
> 
> Is this fixing a behaviour or is this from the clean up/ make it pretty
> category?

It's in response to [1].

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240912084322.148d7fb2@kernel.org/

> The forced-threaded interrupts run with disabled interrupts on !RT so
> this change should not fix anything.

OK, so maybe this isn't necessary at all?

--Sean

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ