[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id:
<172619943277.1807670.1465452734410848226.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2024 03:50:32 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, claudiu.manoil@....com, vladimir.oltean@....com,
louis.peens@...igine.com, damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com,
set_pte_at@...look.com, mpe@...erman.id.au, horms@...nel.org,
yinjun.zhang@...igine.com, ryno.swart@...igine.com, johannes.berg@...el.com,
fei.qin@...igine.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
oss-drivers@...igine.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net RESEND 0/3] net: Use IRQF_NO_AUTOEN flag in request_irq()
Hello:
This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>:
On Wed, 11 Sep 2024 17:44:42 +0800 you wrote:
> As commit cbe16f35bee6 ("genirq: Add IRQF_NO_AUTOEN for request_irq/nmi()")
> said, reqeust_irq() and then disable_irq() is unsafe.
>
> IRQF_NO_AUTOEN flag can be used by drivers to request_irq(). It prevents
> the automatic enabling of the requested interrupt in the same safe way.
> With that the usage can be simplified and corrected.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net,RESEND,1/3] net: apple: bmac: Use IRQF_NO_AUTOEN flag in request_irq()
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/e08ec0597bad
- [net,RESEND,2/3] net: enetc: Use IRQF_NO_AUTOEN flag in request_irq()
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/799a92259977
- [net,RESEND,3/3] nfp: Use IRQF_NO_AUTOEN flag in request_irq()
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/daaba19d357f
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists