lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZufCZAfXB_KFIKmI@pengutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2024 07:30:12 +0200
From: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
	Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, kernel@...gutronix.de,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 0/2] net: phy: Support master-slave config
 via device tree

On Sun, Sep 15, 2024 at 08:41:42PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 15, 2024 at 06:06:30PM +0200, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Fri, 13 Sep 2024 10:40:20 +0200 Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> > > This patch series adds support for configuring the master/slave role of
> > > PHYs via the device tree. A new `master-slave` property is introduced in
> > > the device tree bindings, allowing PHYs to be forced into either master
> > > or slave mode. This is particularly necessary for Single Pair Ethernet
> > > (SPE) PHYs (1000/100/10Base-T1), where hardware strap pins may not be
> > > available or correctly configured, but it is applicable to all PHY
> > > types.
> > 
> > I was hoping we'd see some acks here in time, but now Linus cut the 6.11
> > final so the 6.12 game is over now:
> 
> The device tree binding is not decided on yet. So deferred is correct.

No problem. See you on LPC, my flight starting right now.

Regards,
Oleksij
-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ