netdev - Re: [PATCH v1] stmmac: mmc: dwmac4: Add ip payload error statistics

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240916152325.GB396300@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2024 16:23:25 +0100
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Minda Chen <minda.chen@...rfivetech.com>
Cc: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
	Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] stmmac: mmc: dwmac4: Add ip payload error statistics

On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 05:48:12PM +0800, Minda Chen wrote:
> Add dwmac4 ip payload error statistics, and rename discripter bit macro
> because latest version descriptor IPCE bit claims include ip checksum
> error and l4 segment length error.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Minda Chen <minda.chen@...rfivetech.com>

Hi Minda,

Some feedback on process.

net-next is currently closed for the v6.12 merge window.
Please consider reposting this patch once it re-opens,
after v6.12-rc1 is released, likely about two weeks from now.

RFC patches, and fixes for net are, OTOH, welcome any time.

Also, when posting patches for net-next, please explicitly
target them as such.

	Subject: [PATCH net-next] ...

Link: https://docs.kernel.org/process/maintainer-netdev.html

And lastly, I don't think 'mmc: ' belongs in the patch prefix.
This is an Ethernet driver, right? Looking over git history,
it seems that 'net: stmmac: ' is appropriate here.

	Subject: [PATCH net-next] net: stmmac: ...

-- 
pw-bot: defer