[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<PH7PR21MB3260F88970A04FDB9C0ACCC4CA612@PH7PR21MB3260.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2024 14:35:21 +0000
From: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Erni Sri Satya Vennela
<ernis@...ux.microsoft.com>
CC: KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>, "wei.liu@...nel.org"
<wei.liu@...nel.org>, Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>, "davem@...emloft.net"
<davem@...emloft.net>, "edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>, "shradhagupta@...ux.microsoft.com"
<shradhagupta@...ux.microsoft.com>, "ahmed.zaki@...el.com"
<ahmed.zaki@...el.com>, "colin.i.king@...il.com" <colin.i.king@...il.com>,
"linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] net: mana: Add get_link and get_link_ksettings in ethtool
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
> Sent: Friday, September 13, 2024 11:24 PM
> To: Erni Sri Satya Vennela <ernis@...ux.microsoft.com>
> Cc: KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>; Haiyang Zhang
> <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>; wei.liu@...nel.org; Dexuan Cui
> <decui@...rosoft.com>; davem@...emloft.net; edumazet@...gle.com;
> pabeni@...hat.com; shradhagupta@...ux.microsoft.com;
> ahmed.zaki@...el.com; colin.i.king@...il.com; linux-
> hyperv@...r.kernel.org; netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-
> kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: mana: Add get_link and get_link_ksettings in
> ethtool
>
> On Thu, 12 Sep 2024 00:44:43 -0700 Erni Sri Satya Vennela wrote:
> > Add support for the ethtool get_link and get_link_ksettings
> > operations. Display standard port information using ethtool.
>
> Any reason why? Sometimes people add this callback for virtual
> devices to expose some approximate speed, but you're not reporting
> speed, so I'm curious.
Speed info isn't available from the HW yet. But we are requesting
that from HW team. For now, we just add some minimal info, like
duplex, etc.
>
> > +static int mana_get_link_ksettings(struct net_device *ndev,
> > + struct ethtool_link_ksettings *cmd)
> > +{
> > + cmd->base.duplex = DUPLEX_FULL;
>
> make sense
>
> > + cmd->base.autoneg = AUTONEG_ENABLE;
>
> what's the point of autoneg if we show no link info?
> DISABLE seems more suitable
We don't have strong opinion on this one.
@Vennela, you may remove the 3 items related to autoneg.
>
> > + cmd->base.port = PORT_DA;
>
> Any reason why DA? I'd think PORT_OTHER may be better?
I'm OK with PORT_OTHER too :)
Thanks,
- Haiyang
Powered by blists - more mailing lists