[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <83c562e9-2add-4086-86e7-6e956d2ee70f@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2024 08:55:36 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
<edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Jeff Johnson <jjohnson@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, ath11k@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] dt-bindings: net: ath11k: document the inputs
of the ath11k on WCN6855
On 14/08/2024 10:23, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
>
> Describe the inputs from the PMU of the ath11k module on WCN6855.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
> ---
> v1 -> v2:
> - update the example
I don't understand why this patch is no being picked up. The code
correct represents the piece of hardware. The supplies should be
required, because this one particular device - the one described in this
binding - cannot work without them.
Therefore to clarify, as DT maintainer this counts as full approval:
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists