netdev - Re: Namespaced network devices not cleaned up properly after execution of pmtu.sh kernel selftest

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHTA-uarCi84OTPNJKG2M6daWi=YsWFgf_wd0gKMULeeOvBwXQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 15:01:15 -0500
From: Mitchell Augustin <mitchell.augustin@...onical.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, 
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, 
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>, Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>, 
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	Jacob Martin <jacob.martin@...onical.com>, dann frazier <dann.frazier@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: Namespaced network devices not cleaned up properly after
 execution of pmtu.sh kernel selftest

Hi!

I'm wondering if anyone has taken a look at my reproducer yet. I'd
love to know if it has helped any of you reproduce the bug more
easily.

Patch w/ reproducer:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240916191857.1082092-1-mitchell.augustin@canonical.com/

Thanks,
Mitchell Augustin


On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 2:25 PM Mitchell Augustin
<mitchell.augustin@...onical.com> wrote:
>
> Linking in this thread as well - I submitted a patch to net-next with
> a reproducer for just this bug. It works reliably on Grace/Grace on
> v6.11 (and prior kernels already known to be affected), but I have not
> had a chance to test it on other platforms yet. Let me know if I need
> to adjust anything and whether it reproduces the bug on your machines.
>
> Patch w/ reproducer:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240916191857.1082092-1-mitchell.augustin@canonical.com/
>
> Thanks!
>
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 1:59 PM Mitchell Augustin
> <mitchell.augustin@...onical.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Sorry, I missed that you identified the test case.
> >
> > All good!
> >
> > I will still plan to turn the reproducer for this bug into its own
> > regression test. I think there would still be value in having an
> > individual case that can more reliably trigger this specific issue.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 1:51 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, 13 Sep 2024 08:45:22 -0500 Mitchell Augustin wrote:
> > > > Executing ./pmtu.sh pmtu_ipv6_ipv6_exception manually will only
> > > > trigger the pmtu_ipv6_ipv6_exception sub-case
> > >
> > > Sorry, I missed that you identified the test case.
> > > The split of the test is quite tangential, then.
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Mitchell Augustin
> > Software Engineer - Ubuntu Partner Engineering
> > Email:mitchell.augustin@...onical.com
> > Location:Illinois, United States of America
> >
> >
> > canonical.com
> > ubuntu.com
>
>
>
> --
> Mitchell Augustin
> Software Engineer - Ubuntu Partner Engineering



--
Mitchell Augustin
Software Engineer - Ubuntu Partner Engineering