netdev - Re: [PATCH] igb: Do not bring the device up after non-fatal error

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZvH4hp0DJRoWj-gD@apollo.purestorage.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 16:23:50 -0700
From: Mohamed Khalfella <mkhalfella@...estorage.com>
To: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
Cc: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
	Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Yuanyuan Zhong <yzhong@...estorage.com>,
	Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...hat.com>,
	Auke Kok <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>,
	Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Ying Hsu <yinghsu@...omium.org>,
	intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] igb: Do not bring the device up after non-fatal error

On 2024-09-23 16:11:14 -0700, Jacob Keller wrote:
> 
> 
> On 9/23/2024 2:22 PM, Mohamed Khalfella wrote:
> > Commit 004d25060c78 ("igb: Fix igb_down hung on surprise removal")
> > changed igb_io_error_detected() to ignore non-fatal pcie errors in order
> > to avoid hung task that can happen when igb_down() is called multiple
> > times. This caused an issue when processing transient non-fatal errors.
> > igb_io_resume(), which is called after igb_io_error_detected(), assumes
> > that device is brought down by igb_io_error_detected() if the interface
> > is up. This resulted in panic with stacktrace below.
> > 
> > [ T3256] igb 0000:09:00.0 haeth0: igb: haeth0 NIC Link is Down
> > [  T292] pcieport 0000:00:1c.5: AER: Uncorrected (Non-Fatal) error received: 0000:09:00.0
> > [  T292] igb 0000:09:00.0: PCIe Bus Error: severity=Uncorrected (Non-Fatal), type=Transaction Layer, (Requester ID)
> > [  T292] igb 0000:09:00.0:   device [8086:1537] error status/mask=00004000/00000000
> > [  T292] igb 0000:09:00.0:    [14] CmpltTO [  200.105524,009][  T292] igb 0000:09:00.0: AER:   TLP Header: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
> > [  T292] pcieport 0000:00:1c.5: AER: broadcast error_detected message
> > [  T292] igb 0000:09:00.0: Non-correctable non-fatal error reported.
> > [  T292] pcieport 0000:00:1c.5: AER: broadcast mmio_enabled message
> > [  T292] pcieport 0000:00:1c.5: AER: broadcast resume message
> > [  T292] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > [  T292] kernel BUG at net/core/dev.c:6539!
> > [  T292] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
> > [  T292] RIP: 0010:napi_enable+0x37/0x40
> > [  T292] Call Trace:
> > [  T292]  <TASK>
> > [  T292]  ? die+0x33/0x90
> > [  T292]  ? do_trap+0xdc/0x110
> > [  T292]  ? napi_enable+0x37/0x40
> > [  T292]  ? do_error_trap+0x70/0xb0
> > [  T292]  ? napi_enable+0x37/0x40
> > [  T292]  ? napi_enable+0x37/0x40
> > [  T292]  ? exc_invalid_op+0x4e/0x70
> > [  T292]  ? napi_enable+0x37/0x40
> > [  T292]  ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20
> > [  T292]  ? napi_enable+0x37/0x40
> > [  T292]  igb_up+0x41/0x150
> > [  T292]  igb_io_resume+0x25/0x70
> > [  T292]  report_resume+0x54/0x70
> > [  T292]  ? report_frozen_detected+0x20/0x20
> > [  T292]  pci_walk_bus+0x6c/0x90
> > [  T292]  ? aer_print_port_info+0xa0/0xa0
> > [  T292]  pcie_do_recovery+0x22f/0x380
> > [  T292]  aer_process_err_devices+0x110/0x160
> > [  T292]  aer_isr+0x1c1/0x1e0
> > [  T292]  ? disable_irq_nosync+0x10/0x10
> > [  T292]  irq_thread_fn+0x1a/0x60
> > [  T292]  irq_thread+0xe3/0x1a0
> > [  T292]  ? irq_set_affinity_notifier+0x120/0x120
> > [  T292]  ? irq_affinity_notify+0x100/0x100
> > [  T292]  kthread+0xe2/0x110
> > [  T292]  ? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x20/0x20
> > [  T292]  ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x50
> > [  T292]  ? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x20/0x20
> > [  T292]  ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20
> > [  T292]  </TASK>
> > 
> > To fix this issue igb_io_resume() checks if the interface is running and
> > the device is not down this means igb_io_error_detected() did not bring
> > the device down and there is no need to bring it up.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Mohamed Khalfella <mkhalfella@...estorage.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Yuanyuan Zhong<yzhong@...estorage.com>
> > Fixes: 004d25060c78 ("igb: Fix igb_down hung on surprise removal")
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c | 4 ++++
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
> > index 1ef4cb871452..8c6bc3db9a3d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
> > @@ -9651,6 +9651,10 @@ static void igb_io_resume(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> >  	struct igb_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev);
> >  
> >  	if (netif_running(netdev)) {
> > +		if (!test_bit(__IGB_DOWN, &adapter->state)) {
> > +			dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Resuming from non-fatal error, do nothing.\n");
> > +			return;
> 
> I'm not sure this needs to be a dev_info.

I am okay with changing it to dev_warn() to match 004d25060c78 ("igb:
Fix igb_down hung on surprise removal"). Is that okay?

> 
> Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>